TSTP Solution File: CAT001-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cOa0ZIpkrp true
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:20:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CAT001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cOa0ZIpkrp true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:09:13 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.75 % BCE start: 22
% 0.21/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.21/0.75 % PE start: 21
% 0.21/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.21/0.75 % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.21/0.75 % done 51 iterations in 0.019s
% 0.21/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.75 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(bh_equals_bg, axiom, (( compose @ b @ h ) = ( compose @ b @ g ))).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (((compose @ b @ h) = (compose @ b @ g))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [bh_equals_bg])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(monomorphism, axiom,
% 0.21/0.75 (( ( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ X ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 0.21/0.75 ( ( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ Z ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 (((compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ X1) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ X2) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monomorphism])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 0.21/0.75 (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.21/0.75 ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.21/0.75 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.21/0.75 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl177, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 (((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X1)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X2)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.21/0.75 [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl179, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 (((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X1)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((g) = (X1)))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl177])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl196, plain,
% 0.21/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.75 (((g) = (X0))
% 0.21/0.75 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.21/0.75 != (compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h))))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl179])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl199, plain, (((g) = (h))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl196])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(prove_h_equals_g, conjecture, (( h ) = ( g ))).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( h ) != ( g )),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_h_equals_g])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, (((h) != (g))),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl200, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.75 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.21/0.75 [zip_derived_cl199, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 0.21/0.75
% 0.21/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.75
% 0.21/0.75
% 0.21/0.75 % Terminating...
% 1.42/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.50/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------