TSTP Solution File: BOO083-1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : BOO083-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:30:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.06s 300.41s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : BOO083-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 00:47:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.87/1.29  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.87/1.29  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.87/1.29  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.87/1.29  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Clauses:
% 0.87/1.29  [
% 0.87/1.29     [ =( nand( nand( X, nand( X, nand( X, Y ) ) ), nand( Y, nand( X, Z ) ) )
% 0.87/1.29    , Y ) ],
% 0.87/1.29     [ ~( =( nand( nand( a, a ), nand( b, a ) ), a ) ) ]
% 0.87/1.29  ] .
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.87/1.29  This is a pure equality problem
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Options Used:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  useres =            1
% 0.87/1.29  useparamod =        1
% 0.87/1.29  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.87/1.29  useeqfact =         1
% 0.87/1.29  usefactor =         1
% 0.87/1.29  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.87/1.29  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.87/1.29  usesimpres =        3
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.87/1.29  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.87/1.29  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.87/1.29  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.87/1.29  selectoldest =      5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.87/1.29  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  termordering =      kbo
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  litapriori =        0
% 0.87/1.29  termapriori =       1
% 0.87/1.29  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.87/1.29  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.87/1.29  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.87/1.29  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  litselect =         negord
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =         15
% 0.87/1.29  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.87/1.29  maxlength =         115
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.87/1.29  excuselevel =       1
% 0.87/1.29  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  showgenerated =    0
% 0.87/1.29  showkept =         0
% 0.87/1.29  showselected =     0
% 0.87/1.29  showdeleted =      0
% 0.87/1.29  showresimp =       1
% 0.87/1.29  showstatus =       2000
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  prologoutput =     1
% 0.87/1.29  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.87/1.29  totalproof =       1
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  nand  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:44, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  a  [43, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.87/1.29  b  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   15
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 16
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   16
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 17
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   17
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 18
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   18
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 19
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   19
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 20
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   20
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 21
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   21
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 22
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   22
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 23
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   23
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 24
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   24
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 25
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   25
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.87/1.29  Generated: 86
% 0.87/1.29  Kept: 5
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  The strategy used was not complete!
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Increased maxweight to 26
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Starting Search:
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Resimplifying inuse:
% 0.87/1.29  Done
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  Failed to find proof!
% 0.87/1.29  maxweight =   26
% 0.87/1.29  maxnrclauses = 1Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------