TSTP Solution File: BOO075-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : BOO075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:38:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : BOO075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 20:30:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.42 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.42 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.42 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.42 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.42 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.42 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.42 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.42 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.42 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.19/0.42 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.42 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (nand(nand(a,a),nand(b,a))!=a)).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (nand(nand(X1,nand(nand(X2,X1),X1)),nand(X2,nand(X3,X1)))=X2)).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.43 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43 # Found 8 steps
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (nand(nand(a,a),nand(b,a))!=a), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (nand(nand(a,a),nand(b,a))!=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (nand(nand(a,a),nand(b,a))!=nand(nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a)),nand(a,nand(nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a)),a)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (nand(nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a)),nand(a,nand(nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a)),a)))!=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (nand(a,a)!=nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_72, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (nand(a,nand(nand(a,nand(nand(a,a),a)),a))!=nand(b,a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_33, ...])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (nand(nand(a,a),a)!=a), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_73, ...])).
% 0.19/0.43 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.43 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.43 # Returning from population with 6 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.43 # We now have 6 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.43 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.43 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.43 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------