TSTP Solution File: BOO074-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : BOO074-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:38:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.84s 1.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : BOO074-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 22:13:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2
% 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.77/0.98 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.77/0.98 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.77/0.98 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.77/0.98 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.77/0.98 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.77/0.98 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.77/0.98 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.77/0.98 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.77/0.98 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.77/0.98 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.77/0.98 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.77/0.98 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.77/0.98 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.84/1.00 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.84/1.00 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.84/1.00 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.84/1.00 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.84/1.00
% 0.84/1.00 # End clausification derivation
% 0.84/1.00 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))=X3)).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (add(inverse(add(inverse(a),b)),inverse(add(inverse(a),inverse(b))))!=a)).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.84/1.00 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.84/1.00 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.84/1.00 # Found 5 steps
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X4,X8)),add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))),inverse(add(X4,inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))),inverse(add(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))),X11))))))))=add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X4,X8)),add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))),inverse(add(X4,inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))),inverse(add(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))),X11))))))))=add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (inverse(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X4,X8)),add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))),inverse(add(X4,inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))),inverse(add(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))),X11)))))))))=inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))!=X3), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.84/1.00 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (inverse(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X4,X8)),add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))))),inverse(add(X4,inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))),inverse(add(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4))))))),X11)))))))))=X3), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_31, ...])).
% 0.84/1.00 # End printing tableau
% 0.84/1.00 # SZS output end
% 0.84/1.00 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.84/1.00 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.84/1.00 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 0.84/1.00 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.84/1.00 # Proof search is over...
% 0.84/1.00 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------