TSTP Solution File: BOO071-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : BOO071-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:09:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.79s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,X3,X4),X5,multiply(X2,X3,X6))),multiply(X3,multiply(X6,X5,X4),X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(b),b,a) != a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_tba_axioms_5) ).
cnf(c_95,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,X1,X2),inverse(multiply(multiply(X3,X4,X5),X6,multiply(X3,X4,X7))),multiply(X4,multiply(X7,X6,X5),X3)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X0,X1,X8)),X8),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_129,plain,
multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X2)),X2),X0) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_186,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,X3,X4),multiply(X5,inverse(multiply(X4,inverse(X4),X6)),X6),multiply(X2,X3,inverse(X4)))),multiply(X3,X5,X2)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_427,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1),inverse(X2),multiply(inverse(X3),multiply(X4,inverse(multiply(multiply(X4,X3,X5),multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X5,inverse(X5),X6)),X6),multiply(X4,X3,inverse(X5)))),X2),X3)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_1077,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1),inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X3),X4))),multiply(inverse(X2),X4,X2)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_427]) ).
cnf(c_1420,plain,
multiply(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1),inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X3),X4))),multiply(inverse(X2),X4,X2)) = multiply(inverse(X5),X1,X5),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1077,c_1077]) ).
cnf(c_1467,plain,
multiply(inverse(X0),X1,X0) = X1,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1420,c_1077]) ).
cnf(c_1476,plain,
multiply(X0,inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1),X2)),X2) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_1467]) ).
cnf(c_1659,plain,
inverse(multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1)) = inverse(X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1476,c_1467]) ).
cnf(c_1665,plain,
multiply(X0,inverse(X1),X1) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1476,c_1659]) ).
cnf(c_1700,plain,
multiply(X0,inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2,X3),X4,multiply(X1,X2,X5))),multiply(X2,multiply(X5,X4,X3),X1)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1665,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_1713,plain,
multiply(X0,inverse(X0),X1) = X1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_1700]) ).
cnf(c_1728,plain,
inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1467,c_1713]) ).
cnf(c_1800,plain,
multiply(inverse(X0),X0,X1) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1728,c_1713]) ).
cnf(c_1803,plain,
a != a,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_1800]) ).
cnf(c_1804,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_1803]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : BOO071-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 08:40:28 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule casc_29_ueq --heuristic_context ueq --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.79/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.79/1.16 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.79/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.79/1.16 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 clauses 2
% 3.79/1.16 conjectures 1
% 3.79/1.16 EPR 0
% 3.79/1.16 Horn 2
% 3.79/1.16 unary 2
% 3.79/1.16 binary 0
% 3.79/1.16 lits 2
% 3.79/1.16 lits eq 2
% 3.79/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 3.79/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.79/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 3.79/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.79/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------
% 3.79/1.16 Current options:
% 3.79/1.16 ------
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.79/1.16
% 3.79/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------