TSTP Solution File: BOO018-4 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : BOO018-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:11:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : BOO018-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 08:27:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.39  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.39  Axiom 1 (commutativity_of_multiply): multiply(X, Y) = multiply(Y, X).
% 0.14/0.39  Axiom 2 (multiplicative_id1): multiply(X, multiplicative_identity) = X.
% 0.14/0.39  Axiom 3 (multiplicative_inverse1): multiply(X, inverse(X)) = additive_identity.
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  Goal 1 (prove_inverse_of_1_is_0): inverse(multiplicative_identity) = additive_identity.
% 0.14/0.39  Proof:
% 0.14/0.39    inverse(multiplicative_identity)
% 0.14/0.39  = { by axiom 2 (multiplicative_id1) R->L }
% 0.14/0.39    multiply(inverse(multiplicative_identity), multiplicative_identity)
% 0.14/0.39  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_multiply) }
% 0.14/0.39    multiply(multiplicative_identity, inverse(multiplicative_identity))
% 0.14/0.39  = { by axiom 3 (multiplicative_inverse1) }
% 0.14/0.39    additive_identity
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------