%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : BOO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:10:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : BOO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 08:35:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.67  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.67  original problem:
% 0.20/0.67  axioms:
% 0.20/0.67  add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(X, Y) = multiply(Y, X)
% 0.20/0.67  add(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(add(X, Z), add(Y, Z))
% 0.20/0.67  add(X, multiply(Y, Z)) = multiply(add(X, Y), add(X, Z))
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(add(X, Y), Z) = add(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(X, add(Y, Z)) = add(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 0.20/0.67  add(X, inverse(X)) = multiplicative_identity()
% 0.20/0.67  add(inverse(X), X) = multiplicative_identity()
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(X, inverse(X)) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(inverse(X), X) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(X, multiplicative_identity()) = X
% 0.20/0.67  multiply(multiplicative_identity(), X) = X
% 0.20/0.67  add(X, additive_identity()) = X
% 0.20/0.67  add(additive_identity(), X) = X
% 0.20/0.67  goal:
% 0.20/0.67  inverse(additive_identity()) != multiplicative_identity()
% 0.20/0.67  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.20/0.67  it suffices to show that inverse(additive_identity()) = multiplicative_identity() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.20/0.67  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.20/0.67  6: add(X0, inverse(X0)) = multiplicative_identity().
% 0.20/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  13: add(additive_identity(), X0) = X0.
% 0.20/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  16: multiplicative_identity() = inverse(additive_identity()).
% 0.20/0.67  Proof: A critical pair between equations 6 and 13.
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  37: inverse(additive_identity()) = multiplicative_identity().
% 0.20/0.67  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations []
% 0.20/0.67                 rhs with equations [16].
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------