TSTP Solution File: BOO010-4 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : BOO010-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:49:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : BOO010-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 00:22:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Thu Jun  2 00:22:23 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14057.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.12/0.36  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] {-} add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] {-} multiply(A,B)=multiply(B,A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 6
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 62
% 0.12/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.12/0.40     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.40     distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.40     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 10 [ 1 0 1359 ] (0.00 seconds, 20080 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.10 sec ----> 117 [binary,115.1,20.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  1 [] {+} add(a,multiply(a,b))!=a.
% 0.20/0.49  2 [] {+} add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 0.20/0.49  3 [] {+} multiply(A,B)=multiply(B,A).
% 0.20/0.49  4 [] {-} add(A,multiply(B,C))=multiply(add(A,B),add(A,C)).
% 0.20/0.49  5 [copy,4,flip.1] {-} multiply(add(A,B),add(A,C))=add(A,multiply(B,C)).
% 0.20/0.49  8,7 [] {-} multiply(A,add(B,C))=add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 0.20/0.49  12,11 [] {+} multiply(A,multiplicative_identity)=A.
% 0.20/0.49  14,13 [] {+} add(A,inverse(A))=multiplicative_identity.
% 0.20/0.49  18 [back_demod,5,demod,8] {-} add(multiply(add(A,B),A),multiply(add(A,B),C))=add(A,multiply(B,C)).
% 0.20/0.49  20 [para_from,2.1.1,1.1.1] {+} add(multiply(a,b),a)!=a.
% 0.20/0.49  26,25 [para_into,3.1.1,11.1.1,flip.1] {+} multiply(multiplicative_identity,A)=A.
% 0.20/0.49  60 [para_into,18.1.1.1.1,13.1.1,demod,26,14,26,flip.1] {-} add(A,multiply(inverse(A),B))=add(A,B).
% 0.20/0.49  102 [para_into,60.1.1.2,11.1.1,demod,14,flip.1] {+} add(A,multiplicative_identity)=multiplicative_identity.
% 0.20/0.49  115 [para_from,102.1.1,7.1.1.2,demod,12,12,flip.1] {-} add(multiply(A,B),A)=A.
% 0.20/0.49  117 [binary,115.1,20.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  true clauses given           4      (23.5%)
% 0.20/0.49  false clauses given         13
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.20/0.49     5  0         1
% 0.20/0.49     6  1         1
% 0.20/0.49     7  1         5
% 0.20/0.49     8  0         1
% 0.20/0.49    10  3         2
% 0.20/0.49    11  3         2
% 0.20/0.49    13  3         2
% 0.20/0.49    14  1         1
% 0.20/0.49    15  0         1
% 0.20/0.49    16  2         0
% 0.20/0.49    17  4         1
% 0.20/0.49    18  1         0
% 0.20/0.49    19  2         0
% 0.20/0.49    20  1         0
% 0.20/0.49    25  1         0
% 0.20/0.49    27  1         0
% 0.20/0.49    31  1         0
% 0.20/0.49    33  1         0
% 0.20/0.49  tot:  26        17      (39.5% true)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Model 10 [ 1 0 1359 ] (0.00 seconds, 20080 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Process 14057 finished Thu Jun  2 00:22:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------