TSTP Solution File: BOO009-2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : BOO009-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:18:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  27 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (  26 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity2,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',distributivity2) ).

cnf(additive_inverse1,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',multiplicative_id1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_id2,axiom,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',multiplicative_id2) ).

cnf(additive_id1,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',additive_id1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(distributivity4,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',distributivity4) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(prove_operation,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(a,b)) != a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',prove_operation) ).

cnf(additive_id2,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p',additive_id2) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    distributivity2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    additive_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    multiplicative_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
    multiplicative_id2 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    additive_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distributivity4 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    add(X1,multiplicative_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(a,b)) != a,
    prove_operation ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = add(X1,multiply(X2,additive_identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    additive_id2 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]),c_0_18]),c_0_12]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    add(a,multiply(additive_identity,b)) != a,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem    : BOO009-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:46:59 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIoBcux8Rf/E---3.1_23892.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # sh5l with pid 23974 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.40  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23980 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.40  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.15/0.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.15/0.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.15/0.40  # Processed clauses                    : 67
% 0.15/0.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.15/0.40  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.15/0.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 47
% 0.15/0.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.15/0.40  # Generated clauses                    : 233
% 0.15/0.40  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 147
% 0.15/0.40  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Paramodulations                      : 233
% 0.15/0.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Total rewrite steps                  : 241
% 0.15/0.40  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.15/0.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 0.15/0.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.15/0.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 107
% 0.15/0.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 107
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.15/0.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 118
% 0.15/0.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 46
% 0.15/0.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1997
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.40  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Maximum resident set size: 1428 pages
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.15/0.40  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------