TSTP Solution File: BOO009-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : BOO009-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:47:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 1.06s
% Output : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : BOO009-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 21:25:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.73/1.06 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.73/1.06 Process 6861 was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.73/1.06 Wed Jun 1 21:25:51 2022
% 0.73/1.06 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6708_n024.cluster.edu".
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6708_n024.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.73/1.06 set(auto2).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.73/1.06 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.73/1.06 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.73/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.06 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.73/1.06 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.73/1.06 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.73/1.06 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.73/1.06 clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (23 formulas)
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 Auto_denials:
% 0.73/1.06 % copying label prove_equations to answer in negative clause
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % Assigning unary symbol inverse kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (10).
% 0.73/1.06 Function symbol KB weights: additive_identity=1. multiplicative_identity=1. x=1. y=1. add=1. multiply=1. inverse=0.
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.73/1.06 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.06 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % Proof 1 at 0.10 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_equations.
% 0.73/1.06 % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.73/1.06 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.73/1.06 % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.73/1.06 % Given clauses 25.
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 1 sum(additive_identity,A,A) # label(additive_identity1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 2 sum(A,additive_identity,A) # label(additive_identity2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 7 product(inverse(A),A,additive_identity) # label(multiplicative_inverse1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 9 sum(A,B,add(A,B)) # label(closure_of_addition) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 10 product(A,B,multiply(A,B)) # label(closure_of_multiplication) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 11 -product(x,add(x,y),x) # label(prove_equations) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_equations). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 15 -product(A,B,C) | -product(A,B,D) | C = D # label(multiplication_is_well_defined) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 18 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,B,E) | -sum(A,D,F) | -product(F,B,V6) | sum(C,E,V6) # label(distributivity3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 20 -sum(A,B,C) | -sum(A,D,E) | -product(B,D,F) | -sum(A,F,V6) | product(C,E,V6) # label(distributivity5) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 22 -sum(A,B,C) | -sum(D,B,E) | -product(A,D,F) | -sum(F,B,V6) | product(C,E,V6) # label(distributivity7) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.73/1.06 33 multiply(inverse(A),A) = additive_identity. [hyper(15,a,10,a,b,7,a)].
% 0.73/1.06 116 sum(multiply(additive_identity,A),additive_identity,additive_identity). [hyper(18,a,10,a,b,10,a,c,1,a,d,7,a),rewrite([33(4)])].
% 0.73/1.06 209 -product(additive_identity,y,additive_identity) # answer(prove_equations). [ur(20,a,2,a,b,9,a,d,2,a,e,11,a)].
% 0.73/1.06 446 -sum(multiply(additive_identity,y),additive_identity,additive_identity) # answer(prove_equations). [ur(22,a,2,a,b,2,a,c,10,a,e,209,a)].
% 0.73/1.06 447 $F # answer(prove_equations). [resolve(446,a,116,a)].
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 Given=25. Generated=3284. Kept=446. proofs=1.
% 0.73/1.06 Usable=24. Sos=247. Demods=9. Limbo=2, Disabled=195. Hints=0.
% 0.73/1.06 Megabytes=0.30.
% 0.73/1.06 User_CPU=0.10, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.73/1.06 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.73/1.06
% 0.73/1.06 Process 6861 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 1 21:25:51 2022
% 0.73/1.06 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------