TSTP Solution File: BOO008-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:18:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 8.73s 1.60s
% Output : Saturation 8.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named prove_equality)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_92,hypothesis,
sum(X1,X2,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
x__plus_y_plus_z != x_plus_y__plus_z,
prove_equality,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
product(X1,X2,X3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]),c_0_92])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:32:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2FdrkgElBH/E---3.1_16573.p
% 8.73/1.60 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 8.73/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 16683 completed with status 1
% 8.73/1.60 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 8.73/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.73/1.60 # Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 8.73/1.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 16688 completed with status 1
% 8.73/1.60 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 8.73/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.73/1.60 # Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 8.73/1.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 8.73/1.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 8.73/1.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.73/1.60
% 8.73/1.60 # No proof found!
% 8.73/1.60 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 8.73/1.60 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 8.73/1.60 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 8.73/1.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Initial clauses : 21
% 8.73/1.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 8.73/1.60 # Processed clauses : 5366
% 8.73/1.60 # ...of these trivial : 1528
% 8.73/1.60 # ...subsumed : 507
% 8.73/1.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 3331
% 8.73/1.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Backward-subsumed : 255
% 8.73/1.60 # Backward-rewritten : 3052
% 8.73/1.60 # Generated clauses : 95907
% 8.73/1.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 82254
% 8.73/1.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Paramodulations : 95907
% 8.73/1.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # NegExts : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Total rewrite steps : 21411
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.73/1.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 8.73/1.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 8.73/1.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 8.73/1.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 8.73/1.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 3328
% 8.73/1.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 103749
% 8.73/1.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90383
% 8.73/1.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 762
% 8.73/1.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15849
% 8.73/1.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 22300
% 8.73/1.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 2289
% 8.73/1.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.73/1.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1198345
% 8.73/1.60
% 8.73/1.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/1.60 # User time : 1.055 s
% 8.73/1.60 # System time : 0.054 s
% 8.73/1.60 # Total time : 1.109 s
% 8.73/1.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 8.73/1.60
% 8.73/1.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/1.60 # User time : 5.422 s
% 8.73/1.60 # System time : 0.105 s
% 8.73/1.60 # Total time : 5.527 s
% 8.73/1.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 8.73/1.60 % E---3.1 exiting
% 8.73/1.61 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------