TSTP Solution File: BOO005-4 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : BOO005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:18:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity1,axiom,
add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',distributivity1) ).
cnf(additive_inverse1,axiom,
add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',additive_inverse1) ).
cnf(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',multiplicative_id1) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',commutativity_of_multiply) ).
cnf(prove_a_plus_1_is_a,negated_conjecture,
add(a,multiplicative_identity) != multiplicative_identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',prove_a_plus_1_is_a) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p',commutativity_of_add) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
distributivity1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
additive_inverse1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
multiplicative_id1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_multiply ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(a,multiplicative_identity) != multiplicative_identity,
prove_a_plus_1_is_a ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_add ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
add(X1,multiplicative_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
add(multiplicative_identity,a) != multiplicative_identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
add(multiplicative_identity,X1) = multiplicative_identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : BOO005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:41:58 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yRo49XsBtC/E---3.1_11426.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_3 with pid 11504 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11508 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 28
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 48
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 48
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 36
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 434
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1420 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------