TSTP Solution File: ARI741_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ARI741_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.74s 2.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  13 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   91 (   3 atm;  32 fun;  37 num;  19 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   7   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ pow > #nlpp > sqrt > sqr > log2 > log10 > log > exp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $real ).

tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $real ).

tff('#skE_3',type,
    '#skE_3': $real ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(log,type,
    log: $real > $real ).

tff(sqrt,type,
    sqrt: $real > $real ).

tff(log2,type,
    log2: $real > $real ).

tff(exp,type,
    exp: $real > $real ).

tff(pow,type,
    pow: ( $real * $real ) > $real ).

tff(log10,type,
    log10: $real > $real ).

tff(sqr,type,
    sqr: $real > $real ).

tff(f_109,negated_conjecture,
    pow(2,2) != 4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pow_2_21) ).

tff(f_103,axiom,
    ! [Xa: $real] :
      ( $less(0,Xa)
     => ( pow(Xa,2) = sqr(Xa) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pow_x_two) ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [Xa: $real] : ( sqr(Xa) = $product(Xa,Xa) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sqr_def) ).

tff(f_923,axiom,
    ! [X: $real,Y: $real,Z: $real] :
      ( ( Y != 0 )
     => ( ( Z = $quotient(X,Y) )
      <=> ( X = $product(Y,Z) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas_real.p',nonzero_eq_divide_eq) ).

tff(f_968,axiom,
    ! [A: $real,B: $real] : ( $quotient($uminus(A),B) = $uminus($quotient(A,B)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas_real.p',divide_minus_left) ).

tff(f_911,axiom,
    ! [X: $real,Y: $real] :
      ( ( Y != 0 )
     => ( X = $product(Y,$quotient(X,Y)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas_real.p',quo_1) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    pow(2,2) != 4,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    pow(2,2) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36]) ).

tff(c_594,plain,
    ! [X_189a: $real] :
      ( ( pow(X_189a,2) = sqr(X_189a) )
      | ~ $less(0,X_189a) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_103]) ).

tff(c_610,plain,
    ( ( sqr(2) = '#skE_1' )
    | ~ $less(0,2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_142,c_594]) ).

tff(c_619,plain,
    sqr(2) = '#skE_1',
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_610]) ).

tff(c_177,plain,
    ! [X_140a: $real] : ( $product(X_140a,X_140a) = sqr(X_140a) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [Y_41: $real,Z_42: $real] :
      ( ( $quotient($product(Y_41,Z_42),Y_41) = Z_42 )
      | ( Y_41 = 0 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_923]) ).

tff(c_185,plain,
    ! [X_140a: $real] :
      ( ( $quotient(sqr(X_140a),X_140a) = X_140a )
      | ( X_140a = 0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_177,c_44]) ).

tff(c_657,plain,
    ( ( $quotient('#skE_1',2) = 2 )
    | ( 2 = 0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_619,c_185]) ).

tff(c_856,plain,
    $quotient('#skE_1',2) = 2,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_657]) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    ! [A_83: $real,B_84: $real,X_134: $real] :
      ( ( $uminus($quotient(A_83,B_84)) = $quotient(X_134,B_84) )
      | ( X_134 != $uminus(A_83) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_968]) ).

tff(c_921,plain,
    $quotient($uminus('#skE_1'),2) = $uminus(2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_856,c_118]) ).

tff(c_1060,plain,
    $quotient($uminus('#skE_1'),2) = $uminus(2),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_921]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ! [Y_36: $real,X_37: $real] :
      ( ( $product(Y_36,$quotient(X_37,Y_36)) = X_37 )
      | ( Y_36 = 0 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_911]) ).

tff(c_1133,plain,
    ( ( $product(2,$uminus(2)) = $uminus('#skE_1') )
    | ( 2 = 0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1060,c_41]) ).

tff(c_1134,plain,
    $uminus('#skE_1') = $uminus(4),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_1133]) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    '#skE_1' != 4,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_142,c_36]) ).

tff(c_1264,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_1134,c_144]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ARI741_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:01:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.74/2.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.74/2.50  
% 5.74/2.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.74/2.52  
% 5.74/2.52  Inference rules
% 5.74/2.52  ----------------------
% 5.74/2.52  #Ref     : 0
% 5.74/2.52  #Sup     : 243
% 5.74/2.52  #Fact    : 0
% 5.74/2.52  #Define  : 3
% 5.74/2.52  #Split   : 0
% 5.74/2.52  #Chain   : 0
% 5.74/2.52  #Close   : 1
% 5.74/2.52  
% 5.74/2.52  Ordering : LPO
% 5.74/2.52  
% 5.74/2.52  Simplification rules
% 5.74/2.52  ----------------------
% 5.74/2.52  #Subsume      : 15
% 5.74/2.52  #Demod        : 30
% 5.74/2.52  #Tautology    : 99
% 5.74/2.52  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.74/2.52  #BackRed      : 1
% 5.74/2.52  
% 5.74/2.52  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.74/2.52  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.74/2.52  
% 5.74/2.52  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.74/2.52  ----------------------
% 5.74/2.52  Preprocessing        : 0.77
% 5.74/2.52  Parsing              : 0.37
% 5.74/2.52  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 5.74/2.52  Main loop            : 0.71
% 5.74/2.52  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 5.74/2.52  Reduction            : 0.16
% 5.74/2.52  Demodulation         : 0.11
% 5.74/2.52  BG Simplification    : 0.08
% 5.74/2.52  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 5.74/2.52  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.74/2.52  MUC search           : 0.06
% 5.74/2.52  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.74/2.52  Total                : 1.52
% 5.74/2.52  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.74/2.52  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.74/2.52  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.74/2.52  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------