TSTP Solution File: ARI710_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI710_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:48:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.41s 1.28s
% Output   : Proof 3.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : ARI710_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:52:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.58/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.58/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.58/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.58/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.58/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.58/0.61  
% 0.58/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.58/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.58/0.61  
% 0.58/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.58/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.58/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.58/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.58/0.61  
% 0.58/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.58/0.61  
% 0.58/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.58/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.69/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.05  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.42/1.11  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 6: proved (637ms)
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 5: proved (639ms)
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 2: proved (640ms)
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 3: proved (641ms)
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 0: proved (642ms)
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.28  
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.41/1.28  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 1: Found proof (size 8)
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 4: Found proof (size 8)
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 1: proved (657ms)
% 3.41/1.29  Prover 4: proved (657ms)
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 10: stopped
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.30  Prover 11: stopped
% 3.41/1.31  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.31  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.41/1.31  Prover 7: stopped
% 3.41/1.31  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.41/1.31  
% 3.41/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.31  
% 3.41/1.31  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.41/1.31  Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.41/1.31  ---------------------------------
% 3.41/1.31  
% 3.41/1.31    (conj)
% 3.41/1.32     ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = b) & $product(v0, c) = v1 &
% 3.41/1.32      $product(d, a) = v0)
% 3.41/1.32  
% 3.41/1.32    (eq)
% 3.41/1.32     ? [v0: int] : ($product(v0, d) = b & $product(a, c) = v0)
% 3.41/1.32  
% 3.41/1.32  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.41/1.32  ---------------------------------
% 3.41/1.32  
% 3.41/1.32  Begin of proof
% 3.41/1.32  | 
% 3.41/1.32  | DELTA: instantiating (eq) with fresh symbol all_2_0 gives:
% 3.41/1.32  |   (1)  $product(all_2_0, d) = b & $product(a, c) = all_2_0
% 3.41/1.32  | 
% 3.41/1.32  | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.41/1.33  |   (2)  $product(a, c) = all_2_0
% 3.41/1.33  |   (3)  $product(all_2_0, d) = b
% 3.41/1.33  | 
% 3.41/1.33  | DELTA: instantiating (conj) with fresh symbols all_4_0, all_4_1 gives:
% 3.41/1.33  |   (4)   ~ (all_4_0 = b) & $product(all_4_1, c) = all_4_0 & $product(d, a) =
% 3.41/1.33  |        all_4_1
% 3.41/1.33  | 
% 3.41/1.33  | ALPHA: (4) implies:
% 3.41/1.33  |   (5)   ~ (all_4_0 = b)
% 3.41/1.33  |   (6)  $product(d, a) = all_4_1
% 3.41/1.33  |   (7)  $product(all_4_1, c) = all_4_0
% 3.41/1.33  | 
% 3.41/1.33  | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.96/1.33  |   (8)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4:
% 3.96/1.33  |          int] :  ! [v5: int] :  ! [v6: int] : (v6 = v0 |  ~ ($product(v5, v2)
% 3.96/1.33  |            = v6) |  ~ ($product(v4, v3) = v0) |  ~ ($product(v3, v1) = v5) | 
% 3.96/1.33  |          ~ ($product(v1, v2) = v4))
% 3.96/1.33  | 
% 3.96/1.33  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with b, a, c, d, all_2_0, all_4_1, all_4_0,
% 3.96/1.33  |              simplifying with (2), (3), (6), (7) gives:
% 3.96/1.33  |   (9)  all_4_0 = b
% 3.96/1.33  | 
% 3.96/1.33  | REDUCE: (5), (9) imply:
% 3.96/1.33  |   (10)  $false
% 3.96/1.33  | 
% 3.96/1.33  | CLOSE: (10) is inconsistent.
% 3.96/1.33  | 
% 3.96/1.33  End of proof
% 3.96/1.33  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.96/1.33  
% 3.96/1.33  720ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------