TSTP Solution File: ARI673_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI673_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:48:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.51s 1.25s
% Output   : Proof 3.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ARI673_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:26:29 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.03  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 1.97/1.04  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.45/1.09  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.25  Prover 3: proved (612ms)
% 3.51/1.25  Prover 2: proved (612ms)
% 3.51/1.25  Prover 5: proved (609ms)
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/1.25  
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 6: stopped
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 0: stopped
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.51/1.26  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.51/1.27  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.51/1.27  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.51/1.27  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.51/1.27  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.51/1.27  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.51/1.28  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.28  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.28  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.29  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.29  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.51/1.29  Prover 4: Found proof (size 28)
% 3.51/1.29  Prover 4: proved (654ms)
% 3.51/1.29  Prover 1: stopped
% 3.94/1.29  Prover 11: stopped
% 3.94/1.29  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.94/1.29  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.94/1.29  Prover 7: stopped
% 3.94/1.30  Prover 10: stopped
% 3.94/1.30  
% 3.94/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.30  
% 3.94/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.94/1.31  Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.94/1.31  ---------------------------------
% 3.94/1.31  
% 3.94/1.31    (conj)
% 3.94/1.31     ? [v0: int] : ($product(a, a) = v0 & ((v0 = 1 &  ~ (a = 1) &  ~ (a = -1)) | (
% 3.94/1.31          ~ (v0 = 1) & (a = 1 | a = -1))))
% 3.94/1.31  
% 3.94/1.31  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.94/1.31  ---------------------------------
% 3.94/1.32  
% 3.94/1.32  Begin of proof
% 3.94/1.32  | 
% 3.94/1.32  | DELTA: instantiating (conj) with fresh symbol all_2_0 gives:
% 3.94/1.32  |   (1)  $product(a, a) = all_2_0 & ((all_2_0 = 1 &  ~ (a = 1) &  ~ (a = -1)) |
% 3.94/1.32  |          ( ~ (all_2_0 = 1) & (a = 1 | a = -1)))
% 3.94/1.32  | 
% 3.94/1.32  | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.94/1.32  |   (2)  $product(a, a) = all_2_0
% 3.94/1.32  |   (3)  (all_2_0 = 1 &  ~ (a = 1) &  ~ (a = -1)) | ( ~ (all_2_0 = 1) & (a = 1 |
% 3.94/1.32  |            a = -1))
% 3.94/1.32  | 
% 3.94/1.32  | BETA: splitting (3) gives:
% 3.94/1.32  | 
% 3.94/1.32  | Case 1:
% 3.94/1.32  | | 
% 3.94/1.32  | |   (4)  all_2_0 = 1 &  ~ (a = 1) &  ~ (a = -1)
% 3.94/1.32  | | 
% 3.94/1.32  | | ALPHA: (4) implies:
% 3.94/1.32  | |   (5)  all_2_0 = 1
% 3.94/1.32  | |   (6)   ~ (a = -1)
% 3.94/1.32  | |   (7)   ~ (a = 1)
% 3.94/1.32  | | 
% 3.94/1.32  | | REDUCE: (2), (5) imply:
% 3.94/1.32  | |   (8)  $product(a, a) = 1
% 3.94/1.32  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (9)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, -2)) |  ~ ($product(v0, v0) = 1))
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with a, simplifying with (8) gives:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (10)  $lesseq(-1, a)
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (11)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(2, v0)) |  ~ ($product(v0, v0) = 1))
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with a, simplifying with (8) gives:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (12)  $lesseq(a, 1)
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | STRENGTHEN: (7), (12) imply:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (13)  $lesseq(a, 0)
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | STRENGTHEN: (6), (10) imply:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (14)  $lesseq(0, a)
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | ANTI_SYMM: (13), (14) imply:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (15)  a = 0
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | REDUCE: (8), (15) imply:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (16)  $product(0, 0) = 1
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (17)   ~ ($product(0, 0) = 1)
% 3.94/1.33  | | 
% 3.94/1.33  | | PRED_UNIFY: (16), (17) imply:
% 3.94/1.33  | |   (18)  $false
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | CLOSE: (18) is inconsistent.
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | Case 2:
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | |   (19)   ~ (all_2_0 = 1) & (a = 1 | a = -1)
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | ALPHA: (19) implies:
% 3.94/1.34  | |   (20)   ~ (all_2_0 = 1)
% 3.94/1.34  | |   (21)  a = 1 | a = -1
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | BETA: splitting (21) gives:
% 3.94/1.34  | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | Case 1:
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (22)  a = 1
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | REDUCE: (2), (22) imply:
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (23)  $product(1, 1) = all_2_0
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (24)   ! [v0: int] : (v0 = 1 |  ~ ($product(1, 1) = v0))
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (24) with all_2_0, simplifying with (23) gives:
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (25)  all_2_0 = 1
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | REDUCE: (20), (25) imply:
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (26)  $false
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | CLOSE: (26) is inconsistent.
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | Case 2:
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (27)  a = -1
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | REDUCE: (2), (27) imply:
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (28)  $product(-1, -1) = all_2_0
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (29)   ! [v0: int] : (v0 = 1 |  ~ ($product(-1, -1) = v0))
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.34  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (29) with all_2_0, simplifying with (28) gives:
% 3.94/1.34  | | |   (30)  all_2_0 = 1
% 3.94/1.34  | | | 
% 3.94/1.35  | | | REDUCE: (20), (30) imply:
% 3.94/1.35  | | |   (31)  $false
% 3.94/1.35  | | | 
% 3.94/1.35  | | | CLOSE: (31) is inconsistent.
% 3.94/1.35  | | | 
% 3.94/1.35  | | End of split
% 3.94/1.35  | | 
% 3.94/1.35  | End of split
% 3.94/1.35  | 
% 3.94/1.35  End of proof
% 3.94/1.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.94/1.35  
% 3.94/1.35  727ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------