TSTP Solution File: ARI671_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI671_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:48:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.68s 1.14s
% Output   : Proof 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ARI671_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:49:26 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.62/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.62/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.99/0.98  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.32/1.03  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.68/1.14  Prover 6: proved (505ms)
% 2.68/1.14  Prover 3: proved (508ms)
% 2.68/1.14  Prover 2: proved (509ms)
% 2.68/1.14  Prover 5: proved (506ms)
% 2.68/1.14  Prover 0: proved (506ms)
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.68/1.14  
% 2.68/1.15  
% 2.68/1.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.68/1.15  
% 2.68/1.15  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 2.68/1.15  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 2.68/1.15  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 2.68/1.15  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 1: Found proof (size 11)
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 4: Found proof (size 11)
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 1: proved (524ms)
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 10: stopped
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 4: proved (532ms)
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 7: stopped
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.16  Prover 11: stopped
% 3.19/1.17  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.17  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.19/1.17  
% 3.19/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.17  
% 3.19/1.17  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.19/1.17  Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.19/1.17  ---------------------------------
% 3.19/1.17  
% 3.19/1.17    (conj)
% 3.19/1.18    $product(a, a) = 2
% 3.19/1.18  
% 3.19/1.18  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.19/1.18  ---------------------------------
% 3.19/1.18  
% 3.19/1.18  Begin of proof
% 3.19/1.18  | 
% 3.19/1.18  | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.34/1.19  |   (1)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, -2)) |  ~ ($product(v0, v0) = 2))
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with a, simplifying with (conj) gives:
% 3.34/1.19  |   (2)  $lesseq(-1, a)
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.34/1.19  |   (3)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(2, v0)) |  ~ ($product(v0, v0) = 2))
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with a, simplifying with (conj) gives:
% 3.34/1.19  |   (4)  $lesseq(a, 1)
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | THEORY_AXIOM GroebnerMultiplication: 
% 3.34/1.19  |   (5)   ! [v0: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v0, 1)) |  ~ ($lesseq(-1, v0)) |  ~
% 3.34/1.19  |          ($product(v0, v0) = 2))
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with a, simplifying with (conj) gives:
% 3.34/1.19  |   (6)   ~ ($lesseq(a, 1)) |  ~ ($lesseq(-1, a))
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | BETA: splitting (6) gives:
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  | Case 1:
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | |   (7)  $lesseq(2, a)
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | | COMBINE_INEQS: (4), (7) imply:
% 3.34/1.19  | |   (8)  $false
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | | CLOSE: (8) is inconsistent.
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | Case 2:
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | |   (9)  $lesseq(a, -2)
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | | COMBINE_INEQS: (2), (9) imply:
% 3.34/1.19  | |   (10)  $false
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | | CLOSE: (10) is inconsistent.
% 3.34/1.19  | | 
% 3.34/1.19  | End of split
% 3.34/1.19  | 
% 3.34/1.19  End of proof
% 3.34/1.19  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.34/1.19  
% 3.34/1.19  584ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------