TSTP Solution File: ARI655_1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : ARI655_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  6 17:02:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  12 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  15   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  182 (  30 atm; 102 fun;  50 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   4 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(c_type,type,
    c: $int ).

tff(b_type,type,
    b: $int ).

tff(d_type,type,
    d: $int ).

tff(a_type,type,
    a: $int ).

tff(1,plain,
    ( ~ $lesseq(0,$sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(-1,$product(b,c)),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(b,d)))))
  <=> ~ $greatereq($sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(b,d),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(-1,$product(b,c))))),0) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(2,plain,
    ( ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d))))
  <=> ~ $lesseq(0,$sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(-1,$product(b,c)),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(b,d))))) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(3,plain,
    ( ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d))))
  <=> ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d)))) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(4,plain,
    ( ~ $lesseq(0,$product($difference(a,b),$difference(c,d)))
  <=> ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d)))) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(5,axiom,
    ~ $lesseq(0,$product($difference(a,b),$difference(c,d))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_002) ).

tff(6,plain,
    ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d)))),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5,4]) ).

tff(7,plain,
    ~ $lesseq(0,$product($sum(a,$product(-1,b)),$sum(c,$product(-1,d)))),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6,3]) ).

tff(8,plain,
    ~ $lesseq(0,$sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(-1,$product(b,c)),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(b,d))))),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7,2]) ).

tff(9,plain,
    ~ $greatereq($sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(b,d),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(-1,$product(b,c))))),0),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8,1]) ).

tff(10,plain,
    ( $lesseq(d,c)
  <=> $lesseq($sum(d,$product(-1,c)),0) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(11,plain,
    ( $lesseq(d,c)
  <=> $lesseq(d,c) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(12,axiom,
    $lesseq(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_001) ).

tff(13,plain,
    $lesseq(d,c),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12,11]) ).

tff(14,plain,
    $lesseq($sum(d,$product(-1,c)),0),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13,10]) ).

tff(15,plain,
    ( $lesseq(b,a)
  <=> $lesseq($sum(b,$product(-1,a)),0) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(16,plain,
    ( $lesseq(b,a)
  <=> $lesseq(b,a) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(17,axiom,
    $lesseq(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

tff(18,plain,
    $lesseq(b,a),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17,16]) ).

tff(19,plain,
    $lesseq($sum(b,$product(-1,a)),0),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18,15]) ).

tff(20,plain,
    ( ~ $lesseq($sum(b,$product(-1,a)),0)
    | ~ $lesseq($sum(d,$product(-1,c)),0)
    | $greatereq($sum($product(a,c),$sum($product(b,d),$sum($product(-1,$product(a,d)),$product(-1,$product(b,c))))),0) ),
    inference(theory_lemma,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[20,19,14,9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : ARI655_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 01:20:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------