%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : ARI654_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.79s 1.04s
% Output   : Refutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : ARI654_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 12:31:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.49  % Using integer theory
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_9812_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SMT.
% 0.79/1.04  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_9812_n009.cluster.edu 
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS derived 22 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 48 clauses.
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS backtracked 1 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS allocated 6237 KBytes.
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS spent	0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.79/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.79/1.04  		
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_9812_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 5 :
% 0.79/1.04  4[0:Inp] ||  -> lesseq(y,times(5,x))*.
% 0.79/1.04  5[0:Inp] ||  -> greatereq(times(5,z),minus(y,2))*.
% 0.79/1.04  6[0:Inp] ||  -> lesseq(times(5,z),minus(y,1))*.
% 0.79/1.04  7[0:Inp] ||  -> greatereq(y,minus(times(5,x),1))*.
% 0.79/1.04  68(e)[0:ThR:7,6,5,4] ||  -> .
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_9812_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  Formulae used in the proof : fof_x_type fof_conj_001 fof_conj_003 fof_conj_002
% 0.79/1.04  
% 0.79/1.04  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------