TSTP Solution File: ARI652_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ARI652_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.18s 2.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  26 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   95 (   6 atm;  51 fun;  23 num;  15 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   2 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (;  15   !;   0   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $int ).

%Foreground operators:

tff(f_33,negated_conjecture,
    $product(a,a) != 1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_002) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [A: $int,B: $int] : ( $product(A,B) = $product(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas.p',mult_comm) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [A: $int,B: $int] : ( $uminus($product(A,B)) = $product($uminus(A),B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas.p',minus_mult_left) ).

tff(f_82,axiom,
    ! [C: $int,B: $int] :
      ( ( $product(C,B) = C )
    <=> ( ( C = 0 )
        | ( B = 1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemmas/mult_lemmas.p',mult_cancel_right1) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    $less(2,$sum(a,4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    $lesseq($uminus(2),$difference($uminus(3),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_001) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    $product(a,a) != 1,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    $product(a,a) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_33]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    $product(a,a) != 1,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    '#skE_1' != 1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_53,c_48]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ! [B_7: $int,A_8: $int] : ( $product(B_7,A_8) = $product(A_8,B_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    $product(a,a) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_33]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [A_17: $int,B_18: $int,X_33: $int] :
      ( ( $uminus($product(A_17,B_18)) = $product(X_33,B_18) )
      | ( X_33 != $uminus(A_17) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X_33: $int,B_18: $int,A_17: $int] :
      ( ( $uminus($product(X_33,B_18)) = $product(A_17,B_18) )
      | ( X_33 != $uminus(A_17) ) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_40]) ).

tff(c_95,plain,
    $uminus($product($uminus(a),a)) = '#skE_1',
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_63,c_42]) ).

tff(c_169,plain,
    $uminus($product(a,$uminus(a))) = '#skE_1',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_45,c_95]) ).

tff(c_217,plain,
    $product(a,$uminus(a)) = $uminus('#skE_1'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_169]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [C_23: $int] : ( $product(C_23,1) = C_23 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_339,plain,
    ( ( a = $uminus('#skE_1') )
    | ( $uminus(a) != 1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_217,c_38]) ).

tff(c_341,plain,
    ( ( a = $uminus('#skE_1') )
    | ( a != $uminus(1) ) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_339]) ).

tff(c_564,plain,
    a != $uminus(1),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_341]) ).

tff(c_1,plain,
    $less(2,$sum(a,4)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    $less($uminus(2),a),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_1]) ).

tff(c_3,plain,
    $lesseq($uminus(2),$difference($uminus(3),a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ~ $less($uminus(1),a),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_3]) ).

tff(c_565,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_564,c_35,c_34]) ).

tff(c_569,plain,
    a = $uminus(1),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_341]) ).

tff(c_568,plain,
    a = $uminus('#skE_1'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_341]) ).

tff(c_615,plain,
    $uminus('#skE_1') = $uminus(1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_569,c_568]) ).

tff(c_617,plain,
    '#skE_1' = 1,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_615]) ).

tff(c_619,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_617]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : ARI652_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:33:45 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.18/2.04  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/2.04  
% 3.18/2.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.18/2.07  
% 3.18/2.07  Inference rules
% 3.18/2.07  ----------------------
% 3.18/2.07  #Ref     : 0
% 3.18/2.07  #Sup     : 72
% 3.18/2.07  #Fact    : 0
% 3.18/2.07  #Define  : 1
% 3.18/2.07  #Split   : 15
% 3.18/2.07  #Chain   : 0
% 3.18/2.07  #Close   : 1
% 3.18/2.07  
% 3.18/2.07  Ordering : LPO
% 3.18/2.07  
% 3.18/2.07  Simplification rules
% 3.18/2.07  ----------------------
% 3.18/2.07  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.18/2.07  #Demod        : 19
% 3.18/2.08  #Tautology    : 13
% 3.18/2.08  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.18/2.08  #BackRed      : 8
% 3.18/2.08  
% 3.18/2.08  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.18/2.08  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.18/2.08  
% 3.18/2.08  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.18/2.08  ----------------------
% 3.18/2.08  Preprocessing        : 0.52
% 3.18/2.08  Parsing              : 0.29
% 3.18/2.08  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.18/2.08  Main loop            : 0.37
% 3.18/2.08  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 3.18/2.08  Reduction            : 0.11
% 3.18/2.08  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.18/2.08  BG Simplification    : 0.06
% 3.18/2.08  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.60/2.08  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.60/2.08  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.60/2.08  Cooper               : 0.04
% 3.60/2.08  Total                : 0.95
% 3.60/2.08  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.60/2.08  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.60/2.08  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.60/2.08  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------