%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : ARI602_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ARI602_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 13:11:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  % Using integer theory
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_782_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.73/1.02  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_782_n013.cluster.edu 
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS derived 7 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 38 clauses.
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS allocated 6213 KBytes.
% 0.73/1.02  SPASS spent	0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.73/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.73/1.02  		
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_782_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 0.73/1.02  2[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(f(U),U)*.
% 0.73/1.02  3[0:Inp] || less(U,f(5))* less(4,U) -> .
% 0.73/1.02  35[0:ArS:2.0] ||  -> less(U,f(U))*.
% 0.73/1.02  36[0:TOC:3.1] ||  -> lesseq(U,4) lesseq(f(5),U)*.
% 0.73/1.02  42[0:OCE:36.1,35.0] ||  -> lesseq(5,4)*.
% 0.73/1.02  44(e)[0:ArS:42.0] ||  -> .
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_782_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Formulae used in the proof : fof_f_type fof_fX_gt_X_implies_exist_ineq
% 0.73/1.04  
% 0.73/1.04  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------