%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : ARI601_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.83s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : ARI601_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 13:56:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  % Using integer theory
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_29366_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.83/1.09  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_29366_n026.cluster.edu 
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS derived 7 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 37 clauses.
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS allocated 6212 KBytes.
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS spent	0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.83/1.09  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.83/1.09  		
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_29366_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  % Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 0.83/1.09  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less(3,a)*.
% 0.83/1.09  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(f(U),U)*.
% 0.83/1.09  5[0:Inp] || less(4,f(plus(a,1)))* -> .
% 0.83/1.09  37[0:ArS:4.0] ||  -> less(U,f(U))*.
% 0.83/1.09  38[0:TOC:5.0] ||  -> lesseq(f(plus(a,1)),4)*.
% 0.83/1.09  43[0:OCh:38.0,37.0] ||  -> less(plus(a,1),4)*.
% 0.83/1.09  44[0:ArS:43.0] ||  -> less(a,3)*.
% 0.83/1.09  45(e)[0:OCE:44.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_29366_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  Formulae used in the proof : fof_a_type fof_fX_gt_X_implies_ineq
% 0.83/1.11  
% 0.83/1.11  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------