TSTP Solution File: ARI558_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI558_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:48:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.69s 2.18s
% Output   : Proof 11.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : ARI558_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 19:05:40 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.62/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.62/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.62/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.62/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.62/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.62/0.61  
% 0.62/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.62/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.62/0.61  
% 0.62/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.62/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.62/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.62/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.62/0.61  
% 0.62/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.62/0.61  
% 0.62/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.62/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.48/0.89  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 2.04/0.99  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.48/1.00  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.48/1.07  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.48/1.07  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.94/1.10  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.94/1.10  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.94/1.10  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 6.39/1.58  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.39/1.62  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.08/1.63  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 7.08/1.67  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.90/2.02  Prover 1: Found proof (size 10)
% 9.90/2.02  Prover 1: proved (1387ms)
% 9.90/2.03  Prover 4: stopped
% 9.90/2.03  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.90/2.03  Prover 0: stopped
% 9.90/2.07  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.90/2.07  Prover 3: stopped
% 10.60/2.10  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 10.60/2.10  Prover 2: stopped
% 10.69/2.18  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 10.69/2.18  Prover 5: stopped
% 10.69/2.18  
% 10.69/2.18  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.69/2.18  
% 10.69/2.18  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.69/2.18  Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.69/2.18  ---------------------------------
% 10.69/2.18  
% 10.69/2.18    (rat_combined_problem_18)
% 10.69/2.21     ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$product(v0, rat_-1/20) = v1) |  ?
% 10.69/2.21      [v2: $rat] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, v1) =
% 10.69/2.21        v2 & rat_$lesseq(v2, rat_0) = v3))
% 10.69/2.21  
% 10.69/2.21    (input)
% 11.18/2.23     ~ (rat_very_large = rat_very_small) &  ~ (rat_very_large = rat_-1/20) &  ~
% 11.18/2.23    (rat_very_large = rat_-1/4) &  ~ (rat_very_large = rat_0) &  ~ (rat_very_small
% 11.18/2.23      = rat_-1/20) &  ~ (rat_very_small = rat_-1/4) &  ~ (rat_very_small = rat_0)
% 11.18/2.23    &  ~ (rat_-1/20 = rat_-1/4) &  ~ (rat_-1/20 = rat_0) &  ~ (rat_-1/4 = rat_0) &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$is_int(rat_-1/20) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_-1/4) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_0) =
% 11.18/2.23    0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_-1/20) = 0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_-1/4) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$is_rat(rat_0) = 0 & rat_$floor(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$ceiling(rat_-1/20) =
% 11.18/2.23    rat_0 & rat_$ceiling(rat_-1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$ceiling(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$truncate(rat_-1/20) = rat_0 & rat_$truncate(rat_-1/4) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$truncate(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$round(rat_-1/20) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$round(rat_-1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$round(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$to_int(rat_-1/20) = -1 & rat_$to_int(rat_-1/4) = -1 & rat_$to_int(rat_0)
% 11.18/2.23    = 0 & rat_$to_rat(rat_-1/20) = rat_-1/20 & rat_$to_rat(rat_-1/4) = rat_-1/4 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$to_rat(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$to_real(rat_-1/20) = real_-1/20 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$to_real(rat_-1/4) = real_-1/4 & rat_$to_real(rat_0) = real_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    int_$to_rat(0) = rat_0 & rat_$quotient(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$quotient(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$uminus(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$sum(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = rat_-1/20 & rat_$sum(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = rat_-1/4
% 11.18/2.23    & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = rat_-1/20 & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_-1/4) =
% 11.18/2.23    rat_-1/4 & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_very_small,
% 11.18/2.23      rat_very_large) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/20) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = 1
% 11.18/2.23    & rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/20) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/4)
% 11.18/2.23    = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_-1/20) =
% 11.18/2.23    0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_0) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_-1/20) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large,
% 11.18/2.23      rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_0) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$greater(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/20,
% 11.18/2.23      rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/20) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$greater(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$greater(rat_-1/4, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/20)
% 11.18/2.23    = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/4) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = 1
% 11.18/2.23    & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = 0
% 11.18/2.23    & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small,
% 11.18/2.23      rat_-1/20) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_-1/4) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_-1/20, rat_very_large) =
% 11.18/2.23    0 & rat_$less(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/20) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/4) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_-1/4, rat_very_large) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/20) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/4) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_very_large) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$less(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$product(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$product(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = rat_0
% 11.18/2.23    & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$difference(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/20) = rat_0 & rat_$difference(rat_-1/20,
% 11.18/2.23      rat_0) = rat_-1/20 & rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/4) = rat_0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = rat_-1/4 & rat_$difference(rat_0, rat_0) =
% 11.18/2.23    rat_0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/20) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/20, rat_-1/4) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/20, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/20) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/4, rat_-1/4) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = 0 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_-1/4) = 1 &
% 11.18/2.23    rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_0) = 0 &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat]
% 11.18/2.23    :  ! [v3: $rat] :  ! [v4: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$sum(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5: $rat] : (rat_$sum(v2, v5) = v4 &
% 11.18/2.23        rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : 
% 11.18/2.23    ! [v3: $rat] : (v3 = v1 | v0 = rat_0 |  ~ (rat_$quotient(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat]
% 11.18/2.23    :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1,
% 11.18/2.23          v0) = 0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$less(v2, v1) = v4)) &  !
% 11.18/2.23    [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v4: int] : (
% 11.18/2.23        ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : 
% 11.18/2.23    ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v2) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v1,
% 11.18/2.23          v2) = v3) | rat_$difference(v1, v0) = v3) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 11.18/2.23      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v2 = rat_0 |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: int] :
% 11.18/2.23    (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 11.18/2.23        rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: int]
% 11.18/2.23    : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 11.18/2.23        rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: int] :
% 11.18/2.23    (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ? [v3: int] : ( ~
% 11.18/2.23          (v3 = 0) & rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : 
% 11.18/2.23    ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2) | rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0:
% 11.18/2.23      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 11.18/2.23      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$product(v0, v1) = v2) | rat_$product(v1,
% 11.18/2.23        v0) = v2) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$sum(v0,
% 11.18/2.23          rat_0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.23      (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 11.18/2.23      $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) | rat_$uminus(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :
% 11.18/2.23     ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) | rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) & 
% 11.18/2.23    ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v1,
% 11.18/2.23        v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] : (v0 = rat_0 |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v0))
% 11.18/2.23  
% 11.18/2.24    (function-axioms)
% 11.18/2.24     ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.18/2.24      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3,
% 11.18/2.24          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : 
% 11.18/2.24    ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 11.18/2.24      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  !
% 11.18/2.24    [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$product(v3,
% 11.18/2.24          v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$product(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$difference(v3,
% 11.18/2.24          v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.18/2.24      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) =
% 11.18/2.24        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v0)) & 
% 11.18/2.24    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 =
% 11.18/2.24      v0 |  ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat]
% 11.18/2.24    :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$floor(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$floor(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1
% 11.18/2.24      = v0 |  ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) =
% 11.18/2.24        v1) |  ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 11.18/2.24    [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v0)) &
% 11.18/2.24     ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) =
% 11.18/2.24        v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2:
% 11.18/2.24      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) & 
% 11.18/2.24    ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (rat_$to_real(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_real(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  !
% 11.18/2.24    [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (int_$to_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.18/2.24      (int_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :
% 11.18/2.24    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v0))
% 11.18/2.24  
% 11.18/2.24  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 11.18/2.24  ---------------------------------
% 11.18/2.24  
% 11.18/2.24  Begin of proof
% 11.18/2.24  | 
% 11.18/2.24  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (1)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat]
% 11.18/2.25  |        :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.18/2.25  |          (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 11.18/2.25  |   (2)   ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 =
% 11.18/2.25  |          v0 |  ~ (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$difference(v3, v2)
% 11.18/2.25  |            = v0))
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | ALPHA: (input) implies:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (3)  rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = 0
% 11.18/2.25  |   (4)  rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = rat_-1/4
% 11.18/2.25  |   (5)  rat_$product(rat_0, rat_-1/20) = rat_0
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rat_combined_problem_18) with rat_0, rat_0,
% 11.18/2.25  |              simplifying with (5) gives:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (6)   ? [v0: $rat] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & rat_$difference(rat_-1/4,
% 11.18/2.25  |            rat_0) = v0 & rat_$lesseq(v0, rat_0) = v1)
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1 gives:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (7)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = all_15_1 &
% 11.18/2.25  |        rat_$lesseq(all_15_1, rat_0) = all_15_0
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (8)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 11.18/2.25  |   (9)  rat_$lesseq(all_15_1, rat_0) = all_15_0
% 11.18/2.25  |   (10)  rat_$difference(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = all_15_1
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with rat_-1/4, all_15_1, rat_0, rat_-1/4,
% 11.18/2.25  |              simplifying with (4), (10) gives:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (11)  all_15_1 = rat_-1/4
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | REDUCE: (9), (11) imply:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (12)  rat_$lesseq(rat_-1/4, rat_0) = all_15_0
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_15_0, rat_0, rat_-1/4, simplifying
% 11.18/2.25  |              with (3), (12) gives:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (13)  all_15_0 = 0
% 11.18/2.25  | 
% 11.18/2.25  | REDUCE: (8), (13) imply:
% 11.18/2.25  |   (14)  $false
% 11.18/2.26  | 
% 11.18/2.26  | CLOSE: (14) is inconsistent.
% 11.18/2.26  | 
% 11.18/2.26  End of proof
% 11.18/2.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.18/2.26  
% 11.18/2.26  1646ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------