TSTP Solution File: ARI555_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ARI555_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:48:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  13 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   43 (   7 atm;  13 fun;  23 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   2 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_8,type,
    sF0: $rat ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sF1: $rat ).

tff(f31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f30]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    $less(-9/50,-9/50),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f26,f29]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    -9/50 = sF1,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f28]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    sF1 = $uminus(9/50),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f25,f27]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    sF0 = 9/50,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    $product(-18/25,-1/4) = sF0,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    sF1 = $uminus(sF0),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    $less(sF1,-9/50),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f22,f25,f24]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    $less($uminus($product(-18/25,-1/4)),-9/50),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    $less($uminus($product(-18/25,-1/4)),-9/50),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ~ $less($uminus($product(-18/25,-1/4)),-9/50),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ $greatereq($uminus($product(-18/25,-1/4)),-9/50),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    $greatereq($uminus($product(-18/25,-1/4)),-9/50),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_combined_problem_15) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : ARI555=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:01:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.51  % (22167)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22154)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22156)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22175)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/177Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22175)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/191324Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (22148)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22175)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22147)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------