TSTP Solution File: ARI547_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : ARI547_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:33:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.26s 1.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 19 ( 3 atm; 3 fun; 9 num; 4 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 0 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 (; 3 !; 1 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [Xa: $int] :
( ( $product(Xa,3) = 27 )
& $less(8,Xa) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_combined_problem_11) ).
tff(f_139,plain,
! [Xa: $int] :
( ( $product(Xa,3) != 27 )
| ~ $less(8,Xa) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).
tff(f_142,plain,
! [Xa: $int] :
( ! [Xa: $int] :
( ( $product(Xa,3) != 27 )
| ~ $less(8,Xa) )
<=> $false ),
inference(theorem,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],]) ).
tff(f_143,plain,
$false,
inference(equivalence,[status(thm)],[f_139,f_142]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
$false,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ARI547_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 4 00:25:02 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.26/1.49 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.26/1.50
% 2.26/1.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.39/1.53
% 2.39/1.53 Inference rules
% 2.39/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.39/1.53 #Ref : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Sup : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Fact : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Define : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Split : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Chain : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Close : 0
% 2.39/1.53
% 2.39/1.53 Ordering : LPO
% 2.39/1.53
% 2.39/1.53 Simplification rules
% 2.39/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.39/1.53 #Subsume : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Demod : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Tautology : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.39/1.53 #BackRed : 0
% 2.39/1.53
% 2.39/1.53 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.39/1.53 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.39/1.53
% 2.39/1.53 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.39/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.39/1.53 Preprocessing : 0.40
% 2.39/1.53 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.39/1.53 CNF conversion : 0.01
% 2.39/1.53 Main loop : 0.02
% 2.39/1.53 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Reduction : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Demodulation : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 BG Simplification : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.39/1.53 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Cooper : 0.03
% 2.39/1.53 Total : 0.47
% 2.39/1.53 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.39/1.53 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.39/1.54 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------