TSTP Solution File: ARI464_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : ARI464_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:48:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 12 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 1 ( 1 fml; 0 var)
% Number arithmetic : 26 ( 0 atm; 11 fun; 15 num; 0 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 2 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_5,type,
sF0: $real ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
sF1: $real ).
tff(f23,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f22]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
-70.4 != -70.4,
inference(superposition,[],[f18,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
-70.4 = sF1,
inference(evaluation,[],[f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
$uminus(70.4) = sF1,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f17,f19]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
70.4 = sF0,
inference(evaluation,[],[f16]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
$uminus(-70.4) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
sF1 = $uminus(sF0),
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
-70.4 != sF1,
inference(definition_folding,[],[f15,f17,f16]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
-70.4 != $uminus($uminus(-70.4)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
-70.4 != $uminus($uminus(-70.4)),
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ -70.4 )
= $uminus($uminus(-70.4)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
-70.4 = $uminus($uminus(-70.4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',real_uminus_problem_6) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ARI464=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 15:28:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 % (29599)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.46 % (29623)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/177Mi)
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.47 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.47 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Time elapsed: 0.085 s
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % (29599)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % (29595)Success in time 0.124 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------