TSTP Solution File: ARI423_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI423_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 8.04s 1.87s
% Output   : Proof 10.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ARI423_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:52:12 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.63/0.88  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 2.14/0.98  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.14/0.98  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.58/1.03  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.58/1.03  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.58/1.03  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.58/1.03  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.58/1.03  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.23/1.49  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.86/1.53  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 5.86/1.54  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.47/1.62  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 6.47/1.62  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.47/1.63  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.16/1.69  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.04/1.82  Prover 1: gave up
% 8.04/1.83  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.04/1.84  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.04/1.86  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.04/1.87  Prover 2: proved (1248ms)
% 8.04/1.87  
% 8.04/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.04/1.87  
% 8.04/1.87  Prover 3: stopped
% 8.04/1.87  Prover 6: stopped
% 8.04/1.88  Prover 5: proved (1248ms)
% 8.04/1.88  
% 8.04/1.88  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.04/1.88  
% 8.57/1.88  Prover 0: stopped
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 16: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.91  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.91  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.91  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 9.30/2.08  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.30/2.08  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.82/2.08  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.82/2.09  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.82/2.10  Prover 4: Found proof (size 8)
% 9.82/2.10  Prover 4: proved (1476ms)
% 9.82/2.10  Prover 13: stopped
% 9.82/2.10  Prover 11: stopped
% 9.82/2.10  Prover 8: stopped
% 10.15/2.11  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.19/2.11  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.19/2.11  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.19/2.12  Prover 7: stopped
% 10.19/2.12  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.19/2.13  Prover 10: stopped
% 10.19/2.14  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.19/2.14  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.19/2.15  Prover 16: stopped
% 10.19/2.15  
% 10.19/2.15  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.19/2.15  
% 10.19/2.15  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.19/2.15  Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.19/2.15  ---------------------------------
% 10.19/2.15  
% 10.19/2.15    (real_sum_problem_23)
% 10.19/2.17     ! [v0: $real] :  ~ (real_$sum(v0, real_-3500000) = real_0)
% 10.19/2.17  
% 10.19/2.17    (input)
% 10.19/2.20     ~ (real_very_large = real_very_small) &  ~ (real_very_large = real_-3500000)
% 10.19/2.20    &  ~ (real_very_large = real_0) &  ~ (real_very_small = real_-3500000) &  ~
% 10.19/2.20    (real_very_small = real_0) &  ~ (real_-3500000 = real_0) &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$is_int(real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$is_int(real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$is_rat(real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$is_rat(real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$floor(real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 & real_$floor(real_0) = real_0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$ceiling(real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 & real_$ceiling(real_0) = real_0
% 10.19/2.20    & real_$truncate(real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 & real_$truncate(real_0) =
% 10.19/2.20    real_0 & real_$round(real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 & real_$round(real_0) =
% 10.19/2.20    real_0 & real_$to_int(real_-3500000) = -3500000 & real_$to_int(real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$to_rat(real_-3500000) = rat_-3500000 & real_$to_rat(real_0) = rat_0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$to_real(real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 & real_$to_real(real_0) = real_0
% 10.19/2.20    & int_$to_real(-3500000) = real_-3500000 & int_$to_real(0) = real_0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$quotient(real_0, real_-3500000) = real_0 & real_$product(real_-3500000,
% 10.19/2.20      real_0) = real_0 & real_$product(real_0, real_-3500000) = real_0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$product(real_0, real_0) = real_0 & real_$difference(real_-3500000,
% 10.19/2.20      real_-3500000) = real_0 & real_$difference(real_-3500000, real_0) =
% 10.19/2.20    real_-3500000 & real_$difference(real_0, real_0) = real_0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$uminus(real_0) = real_0 & real_$greatereq(real_very_small,
% 10.19/2.20      real_very_large) = 1 & real_$greatereq(real_-3500000, real_-3500000) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$greatereq(real_-3500000, real_0) = 1 & real_$greatereq(real_0,
% 10.19/2.20      real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$greatereq(real_0, real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$lesseq(real_very_small, real_very_large) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$lesseq(real_-3500000, real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$lesseq(real_-3500000,
% 10.19/2.20      real_0) = 0 & real_$lesseq(real_0, real_-3500000) = 1 & real_$lesseq(real_0,
% 10.19/2.20      real_0) = 0 & real_$greater(real_very_large, real_-3500000) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$greater(real_very_large, real_0) = 0 & real_$greater(real_very_small,
% 10.19/2.20      real_very_large) = 1 & real_$greater(real_-3500000, real_very_small) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$greater(real_-3500000, real_-3500000) = 1 & real_$greater(real_-3500000,
% 10.19/2.20      real_0) = 1 & real_$greater(real_0, real_very_small) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$greater(real_0, real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$greater(real_0, real_0) = 1 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$less(real_very_small, real_very_large) = 0 & real_$less(real_very_small,
% 10.19/2.20      real_-3500000) = 0 & real_$less(real_very_small, real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$less(real_-3500000, real_very_large) = 0 & real_$less(real_-3500000,
% 10.19/2.20      real_-3500000) = 1 & real_$less(real_-3500000, real_0) = 0 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$less(real_0, real_very_large) = 0 & real_$less(real_0, real_-3500000) =
% 10.19/2.20    1 & real_$less(real_0, real_0) = 1 & real_$sum(real_-3500000, real_0) =
% 10.19/2.20    real_-3500000 & real_$sum(real_0, real_-3500000) = real_-3500000 &
% 10.19/2.20    real_$sum(real_0, real_0) = real_0 &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2:
% 10.19/2.20      $real] :  ! [v3: $real] :  ! [v4: $real] : ( ~ (real_$sum(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~
% 10.19/2.20      (real_$sum(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5: $real] : (real_$sum(v2, v5) = v4 &
% 10.68/2.20        real_$sum(v1, v0) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v3: $real] :  ! [v4: $real] : ( ~ (real_$sum(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$sum(v1, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5: $real] : (real_$sum(v5, v0) = v4 &
% 10.68/2.20        real_$sum(v2, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & real_$lesseq(v1,
% 10.68/2.20          v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] :  ! [v3:
% 10.68/2.20      int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ (real_$less(v2, v0) =
% 10.68/2.20        v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & real_$less(v1, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v4: int] :
% 10.68/2.20      ( ~ (v4 = 0) & real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real]
% 10.68/2.20    :  ! [v2: $real] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & real_$less(v2, v1)
% 10.68/2.20        = v4)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] :  ! [v3: int] :
% 10.68/2.20    (v3 = 0 |  ~ (real_$less(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ (real_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4:
% 10.68/2.20        int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (real_$less(v2, v0)
% 10.68/2.20        = v3) |  ~ (real_$less(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 10.68/2.20        real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v3: $real] : ( ~ (real_$uminus(v0) = v2) |  ~ (real_$sum(v1,
% 10.68/2.20          v2) = v3) | real_$difference(v1, v0) = v3) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (real_$less(v1, v0) = v2) | 
% 10.68/2.20      ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] : 
% 10.68/2.20    ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (real_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v2) | 
% 10.68/2.20      ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] : 
% 10.68/2.20    ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) |  ?
% 10.68/2.20      [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] :
% 10.68/2.20     ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) |  ?
% 10.68/2.20      [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (real_$greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ?
% 10.68/2.20      [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (real_$less(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3:
% 10.68/2.20        int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & real_$greater(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : (v0 = real_0 |  ~ (real_$product(v1, v0) = v2)
% 10.68/2.20      | real_$quotient(v2, v0) = v1) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] : ( ~ (real_$product(v1, v0) = v2) | real_$product(v0, v1) = v2) &  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$product(v0, v1) =
% 10.68/2.20        v2) | real_$product(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$difference(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: $real] :
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$uminus(v0) = v3 & real_$sum(v1, v3) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1:
% 10.68/2.20      $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | real_$lesseq(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$less(v1, v0) = 0) | real_$less(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$less(v2, v1) = 0) | real_$less(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$sum(v1, v0) = v2) | real_$sum(v0,
% 10.68/2.20        v1) = v2) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$sum(v0, v1) = v2) | real_$sum(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | real_$less(v1, v0) =
% 10.68/2.20      0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (real_$sum(v0, real_0)
% 10.68/2.20        = v1)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (real_$lesseq(v0,
% 10.68/2.20          v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : ( ~ (real_$uminus(v0) =
% 10.68/2.20        v1) | real_$uminus(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : ( ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$uminus(v0) = v1) | real_$sum(v0, v1) = real_0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] : ( ~ (real_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) | real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) & 
% 10.68/2.20    ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : ( ~ (real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |
% 10.68/2.20      real_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : ( ~
% 10.68/2.20      (real_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) | real_$less(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v1: $real] : ( ~ (real_$less(v1, v0) = 0) | real_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) &  !
% 10.68/2.20    [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] : ( ~ (real_$less(v1, v0) = 0) |
% 10.68/2.20      real_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : (
% 10.68/2.20      ~ (real_$less(v0, v0) = v1) | real_$lesseq(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $real] :
% 10.68/2.20    (v0 = real_0 |  ~ (real_$uminus(v0) = v0))
% 10.68/2.20  
% 10.68/2.20  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 10.68/2.20  ---------------------------------
% 10.68/2.20  
% 10.68/2.20  Begin of proof
% 10.68/2.20  | 
% 10.68/2.20  | ALPHA: (input) implies:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (1)  real_$difference(real_-3500000, real_-3500000) = real_0
% 10.68/2.21  |   (2)   ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~ (real_$sum(v1,
% 10.68/2.21  |              v0) = v2) | real_$sum(v0, v1) = v2)
% 10.68/2.21  |   (3)   ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $real] : ( ~
% 10.68/2.21  |          (real_$difference(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: $real] : (real_$uminus(v0)
% 10.68/2.21  |            = v3 & real_$sum(v1, v3) = v2))
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with real_-3500000, real_-3500000, real_0,
% 10.68/2.21  |              simplifying with (1) gives:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (4)   ? [v0: $real] : (real_$uminus(real_-3500000) = v0 &
% 10.68/2.21  |          real_$sum(real_-3500000, v0) = real_0)
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbol all_22_0 gives:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (5)  real_$uminus(real_-3500000) = all_22_0 & real_$sum(real_-3500000,
% 10.68/2.21  |          all_22_0) = real_0
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (6)  real_$sum(real_-3500000, all_22_0) = real_0
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_22_0, real_-3500000, real_0,
% 10.68/2.21  |              simplifying with (6) gives:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (7)  real_$sum(all_22_0, real_-3500000) = real_0
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (real_sum_problem_23) with all_22_0, simplifying
% 10.68/2.21  |              with (7) gives:
% 10.68/2.21  |   (8)  $false
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  | CLOSE: (8) is inconsistent.
% 10.68/2.21  | 
% 10.68/2.21  End of proof
% 10.68/2.21  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.68/2.21  
% 10.68/2.21  1611ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------