TSTP Solution File: ARI313_1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : ARI313_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 4.73s 1.43s
% Output : Proof 7.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ARI313_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:43:27 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.68/0.67 ________ _____
% 0.68/0.67 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.68/0.67 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.68/0.67 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.68/0.67 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.68/0.67
% 0.68/0.67 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.68/0.67 (2023-06-19)
% 0.68/0.67
% 0.68/0.67 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.68/0.67 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.68/0.67 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.68/0.67 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.68/0.67
% 0.68/0.67 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.68/0.67
% 0.68/0.67 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.69 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.68/0.70 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.89/1.03 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 2.33/1.10 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.10 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.15 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.15 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.15 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.16 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.16 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.20/1.39 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.73/1.41 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.73/1.43 Prover 0: proved (729ms)
% 4.73/1.43
% 4.73/1.43 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.73/1.43
% 4.73/1.43 Prover 6: proved (724ms)
% 4.73/1.43
% 4.73/1.43 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.73/1.43
% 4.73/1.44 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 4.73/1.44 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.73/1.44 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.73/1.44 Prover 2: stopped
% 4.73/1.45 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 4.73/1.45 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 4.73/1.45 Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.73/1.45 Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.28/1.47 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.28/1.47 Prover 5: stopped
% 5.28/1.47 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.28/1.47 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.28/1.47 Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.28/1.48 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.28/1.48 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 5.28/1.49 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.28/1.49 Prover 3: stopped
% 5.28/1.49 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.53/1.50 Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.53/1.50 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 5.53/1.52 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 6.52/1.64 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.52/1.65 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 6.52/1.65 Prover 1: proved (950ms)
% 6.52/1.65 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.52/1.66 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.52/1.66 Prover 8: stopped
% 6.52/1.68 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.52/1.68 Prover 4: stopped
% 6.52/1.68 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.52/1.68 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.52/1.68 Prover 13: stopped
% 7.08/1.74 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.08/1.74 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.08/1.74 Prover 10: stopped
% 7.08/1.75 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.08/1.75 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.08/1.75 Prover 7: stopped
% 7.71/1.84 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.71/1.84 Prover 11: stopped
% 7.71/1.84
% 7.71/1.84 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.71/1.84
% 7.71/1.84 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.71/1.84 Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.71/1.84 ---------------------------------
% 7.71/1.84
% 7.71/1.84 (rat_uminus_problem_6)
% 7.71/1.84 $false
% 7.71/1.84
% 7.71/1.84 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 7.71/1.84 ---------------------------------
% 7.71/1.84
% 7.71/1.84 Begin of proof
% 7.71/1.85 |
% 7.71/1.85 | CLOSE: (rat_uminus_problem_6) is inconsistent.
% 7.71/1.85 |
% 7.71/1.85 End of proof
% 7.71/1.85 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.71/1.85
% 7.71/1.85 1175ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------