TSTP Solution File: ARI312_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ARI312_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:47:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :    1 (   1 fml;   0 var)
%            Number arithmetic     :   16 (   0 atm;   8 fun;   8 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   0 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    3/4 != $uminus($uminus(3/4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    3/4 != $uminus($uminus(3/4)),
    inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ 3/4 )
    = $uminus($uminus(3/4)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    3/4 = $uminus($uminus(3/4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_uminus_problem_5) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : ARI312=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 15:55:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.48  % (21619)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (21611)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (21619)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (21596)Success in time 0.153 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------