TSTP Solution File: ARI283_1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : ARI283_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 10:35:00 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.29s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   23 (   0 atm;   8 fun;  10 num;   5 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   0 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   2   !;   3   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(-7/8,$uminus(3/8)) != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(-7/8,$uminus(3/8)) != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(-7/8,$uminus(3/8)) = X0 ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0: $rat] : ( $difference(-7/8,3/8) = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ? [X0: $rat] : ( $difference(-7/8,3/8) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_difference_problem_11) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : ARI283_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:43:21 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.08/0.28  % (12000)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.29  % (12003)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.29  
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Memory used [KB]: 732
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29  % (12007)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29  % (12000)Success in time 0.002 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------