TSTP Solution File: ARI228_1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : ARI228_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:40:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.29s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ARI228_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:27:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.29/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.29/1.19 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.29/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.29/1.19 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Parsing...
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 clauses 11
% 1.29/1.19 conjectures 1
% 1.29/1.19 EPR 4
% 1.29/1.19 Horn 9
% 1.29/1.19 unary 8
% 1.29/1.19 binary 1
% 1.29/1.19 lits 16
% 1.29/1.19 lits eq 7
% 1.29/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 1.29/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.29/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 1.29/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 1.29/1.19 AC symbols 1
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------
% 1.29/1.19 Current options:
% 1.29/1.19 ------
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.19 ? [X0 : $rat] : $greater(X0,-75/112)),
% 1.29/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_greater_problem_12)).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.19 ~? [X0 : $rat] : $greater(X0,-75/112)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f3,plain,(
% 1.29/1.19 ~? [X0 : $rat] : $less(-75/112,X0)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f9,plain,(
% 1.29/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $rat] : (~$less(X0,X0)) )),
% 1.29/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_145,[])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f13,plain,(
% 1.29/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($less(X0,X1) | $less(X1,$sum(X0,1/1))) )),
% 1.29/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_150,[])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f15,plain,(
% 1.29/1.19 ! [X0 : $rat] : ~$less(-75/112,X0)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 tff(f16,plain,(
% 1.29/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $rat] : (~$less(-75/112,X0)) )),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 cnf(c_50,plain,
% 1.29/1.19 ($less_rat(X0_4,$sum_rat(X1_4,1/1))|$less_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 1.29/1.19 (~$less_rat(X0_4,X0_4)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
% 1.29/1.19 (~$less_rat(-75/112,X0_4)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 cnf(c_315,plain,
% 1.29/1.19 ($less_rat(X0_4,-75/112)),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_60])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 cnf(c_318,plain,
% 1.29/1.19 ($false),
% 1.29/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_54])).
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.19
% 1.29/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------