TSTP Solution File: ARI191_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI191_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.06s 1.60s
% Output   : Proof 9.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ARI191_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:38:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.53/0.96  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 2.05/1.04  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.05/1.05  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.10  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.11  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.14  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.14  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.14  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 6.06/1.57  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.06/1.59  Prover 6: proved (940ms)
% 6.06/1.60  
% 6.06/1.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.06/1.60  
% 6.06/1.61  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.06/1.61  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.49/1.61  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 6.49/1.61  Prover 0: stopped
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 2: stopped
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 6.49/1.62  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.83/1.66  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.83/1.66  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.83/1.68  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.51/1.77  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.85/1.79  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.58/1.92  Prover 4: Found proof (size 4)
% 8.58/1.92  Prover 4: proved (1272ms)
% 8.58/1.92  Prover 1: stopped
% 8.58/1.92  Prover 8: stopped
% 8.58/1.93  Prover 10: stopped
% 8.58/1.94  Prover 7: stopped
% 8.58/1.95  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.58/1.95  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.04/1.98  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.04/1.98  Prover 3: stopped
% 9.04/1.98  
% 9.04/1.98  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.04/1.98  
% 9.04/1.98  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.04/1.98  Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.04/1.98  ---------------------------------
% 9.04/1.98  
% 9.04/1.98    (rat_less_problem_2)
% 9.04/2.00    rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_1/21) = 0
% 9.04/2.00  
% 9.04/2.00    (input)
% 9.27/2.03     ~ (rat_very_large = rat_very_small) &  ~ (rat_very_large = rat_1/21) &  ~
% 9.27/2.03    (rat_very_large = rat_1/2) &  ~ (rat_very_large = rat_0) &  ~ (rat_very_small
% 9.27/2.03      = rat_1/21) &  ~ (rat_very_small = rat_1/2) &  ~ (rat_very_small = rat_0) & 
% 9.27/2.04    ~ (rat_1/21 = rat_1/2) &  ~ (rat_1/21 = rat_0) &  ~ (rat_1/2 = rat_0) &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$is_int(rat_1/21) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_0) = 0
% 9.27/2.04    & rat_$is_rat(rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_1/2) = 0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_0) =
% 9.27/2.04    0 & rat_$floor(rat_1/21) = rat_0 & rat_$floor(rat_1/2) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$floor(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$ceiling(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$truncate(rat_1/21) = rat_0 & rat_$truncate(rat_1/2) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$truncate(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$round(rat_1/21) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$round(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$to_int(rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$to_int(rat_1/2) =
% 9.27/2.04    0 & rat_$to_int(rat_0) = 0 & rat_$to_rat(rat_1/21) = rat_1/21 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$to_rat(rat_1/2) = rat_1/2 & rat_$to_rat(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$to_real(rat_1/21) = real_1/21 & rat_$to_real(rat_1/2) = real_1/2 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$to_real(rat_0) = real_0 & int_$to_rat(0) = rat_0 & rat_$quotient(rat_0,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/21) = rat_0 & rat_$quotient(rat_0, rat_1/2) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$product(rat_1/21, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_1/2, rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$product(rat_0, rat_1/21) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_1/2) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$product(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$difference(rat_1/21, rat_1/21) =
% 9.27/2.04    rat_0 & rat_$difference(rat_1/21, rat_0) = rat_1/21 & rat_$difference(rat_1/2,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/2) = rat_0 & rat_$difference(rat_1/2, rat_0) = rat_1/2 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$difference(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$uminus(rat_0) = rat_0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$sum(rat_1/21, rat_0) = rat_1/21 & rat_$sum(rat_1/2, rat_0) = rat_1/2 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_1/21) = rat_1/21 & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_1/2) = rat_1/2 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_very_small,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_very_large) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_1/21, rat_1/21) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greatereq(rat_1/21, rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_1/21, rat_0) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greatereq(rat_1/2, rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_1/2, rat_1/2) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greatereq(rat_1/2, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_1/21) = 1 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_0) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$lesseq(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/21,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/21, rat_1/2) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/21,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_0) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/2, rat_1/21) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/2,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/2) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/2, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_0,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_1/2) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_0)
% 9.27/2.04    = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_1/21) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_1/2) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_0) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 1 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greater(rat_1/21, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_1/21, rat_1/21)
% 9.27/2.04    = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_1/21, rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_1/21, rat_0) = 0
% 9.27/2.04    & rat_$greater(rat_1/2, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_1/2, rat_1/21)
% 9.27/2.04    = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_1/2, rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_1/2, rat_0) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_1/21) = 1 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_1/2) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small,
% 9.27/2.04      rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_1/2) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_1/21, rat_very_large) = 0
% 9.27/2.04    & rat_$less(rat_1/21, rat_1/21) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_1/21, rat_1/2) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_1/21, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_very_large) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_1/21) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_1/2) = 1 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_very_large) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_0, rat_1/21) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_1/2) = 0 &
% 9.27/2.04    rat_$less(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : 
% 9.27/2.04    ! [v3: $rat] :  ! [v4: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v2,
% 9.27/2.04          v1) = v3) |  ? [v5: $rat] : (rat_$sum(v2, v5) = v4 & rat_$sum(v1, v0) =
% 9.27/2.04        v5)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] :  !
% 9.27/2.04    [v4: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v3) |  ?
% 9.27/2.04      [v5: $rat] : (rat_$sum(v5, v0) = v4 & rat_$sum(v2, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.27/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 9.27/2.04      (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4: int] : (
% 9.27/2.04        ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : 
% 9.27/2.04    ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 9.27/2.04      (rat_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$less(v1, v0) =
% 9.27/2.04        v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3
% 9.27/2.04      = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v4:
% 9.27/2.04        int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 9.27/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) =
% 9.27/2.04        0) |  ~ (rat_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 9.27/2.04        rat_$less(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :
% 9.27/2.04     ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ (rat_$less(v2, v0) =
% 9.27/2.04        v3) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.27/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 9.27/2.04      (rat_$less(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 9.27/2.04        (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 9.27/2.04    [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v2) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v1, v2)
% 9.27/2.04        = v3) | rat_$difference(v1, v0) = v3) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 9.27/2.04    [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : (
% 9.27/2.04        ~ (v3 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : 
% 9.27/2.04    ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~
% 9.27/2.04        (v3 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 9.27/2.04    [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 =
% 9.27/2.04          0) & rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 9.27/2.04    [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 =
% 9.27/2.04          0) & rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2:
% 9.27/2.04      int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 =
% 9.27/2.04          0) & rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2:
% 9.27/2.04      int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 9.27/2.04        rat_$greater(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2:
% 9.27/2.04      $rat] : (v0 = rat_0 |  ~ (rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2) | rat_$quotient(v2, v0)
% 9.27/2.04      = v1) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~
% 9.27/2.04      (rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2) | rat_$product(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0: $rat] : 
% 9.27/2.04    ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$product(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 9.27/2.04      rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :
% 9.43/2.04    ( ~ (rat_$difference(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3: $rat] : (rat_$uminus(v0) = v3 &
% 9.43/2.04        rat_$sum(v1, v3) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :
% 9.43/2.04    ( ~ (rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v2) | rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 9.43/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2) | rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v2)
% 9.43/2.04    &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) =
% 9.43/2.04        0) |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$lesseq(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 9.43/2.04      (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$less(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1:
% 9.43/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~ (rat_$less(v2,
% 9.43/2.04          v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v2, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : (v1
% 9.43/2.04      = v0 |  ~ (rat_$sum(v0, rat_0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : (v1
% 9.43/2.04      = v0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat]
% 9.43/2.04    :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  !
% 9.43/2.04    [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) | rat_$uminus(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) | rat_$sum(v0, v1) =
% 9.43/2.04      rat_0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) |
% 9.43/2.04      rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~
% 9.43/2.04      (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  !
% 9.43/2.04    [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.04      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) | rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) =
% 9.43/2.04      0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) |
% 9.43/2.04      rat_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ( ~
% 9.43/2.04      (rat_$less(v0, v0) = v1) | rat_$lesseq(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $rat] : (v0 =
% 9.43/2.04      rat_0 |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v0))
% 9.43/2.04  
% 9.43/2.04    (function-axioms)
% 9.43/2.05     ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$product(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$product(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 9.43/2.05    [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3,
% 9.43/2.05          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : 
% 9.43/2.05    ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.43/2.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] :  ! [v3:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$less(v3, v2) =
% 9.43/2.05        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v0)) & 
% 9.43/2.05    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 =
% 9.43/2.05      v0 |  ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat]
% 9.43/2.05    :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$floor(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$floor(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1
% 9.43/2.05      = v0 |  ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) =
% 9.43/2.05        v1) |  ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  !
% 9.43/2.05    [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v0)) &
% 9.43/2.05     ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) =
% 9.43/2.05        v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2:
% 9.43/2.05      $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) & 
% 9.43/2.05    ! [v0: $real] :  ! [v1: $real] :  ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (rat_$to_real(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$to_real(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  !
% 9.43/2.05    [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (int_$to_rat(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.43/2.05      (int_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $rat] :  ! [v1: $rat] :  ! [v2: $rat] :
% 9.43/2.05    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v0))
% 9.43/2.05  
% 9.43/2.05  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.43/2.05  ---------------------------------
% 9.43/2.05  
% 9.43/2.05  Begin of proof
% 9.43/2.05  | 
% 9.43/2.05  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 9.43/2.06  |   (1)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $rat]
% 9.43/2.06  |        :  ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.43/2.06  |          (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v0))
% 9.43/2.06  | 
% 9.43/2.06  | ALPHA: (input) implies:
% 9.43/2.06  |   (2)  rat_$less(rat_1/2, rat_1/21) = 1
% 9.43/2.06  | 
% 9.43/2.06  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, 1, rat_1/21, rat_1/2, simplifying with
% 9.43/2.06  |              (2), (rat_less_problem_2) gives:
% 9.43/2.06  |   (3)  $false
% 9.43/2.06  | 
% 9.43/2.06  | CLOSE: (3) is inconsistent.
% 9.43/2.06  | 
% 9.43/2.06  End of proof
% 9.43/2.06  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.43/2.06  
% 9.43/2.06  1439ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------