TSTP Solution File: ARI187_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ARI187_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:33:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.32s 1.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   4 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   11 (   0 atm;   3 fun;   8 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   0 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p > #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(p,type,
    p: $int > $o ).

tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( p($sum($product(14,3),8))
     => p(50) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    p($sum(42,8)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    p(50),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    ~ p(50),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : ARI187_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:42:56 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.32/1.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.32/1.59  
% 2.32/1.59  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.32/1.63  
% 2.32/1.63  Inference rules
% 2.32/1.63  ----------------------
% 2.32/1.63  #Ref     : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Sup     : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Fact    : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Define  : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Split   : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Chain   : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Close   : 0
% 2.32/1.63  
% 2.32/1.63  Ordering : LPO
% 2.32/1.63  
% 2.32/1.63  Simplification rules
% 2.32/1.63  ----------------------
% 2.32/1.63  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.32/1.63  #Demod        : 1
% 2.32/1.63  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.32/1.63  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.32/1.63  
% 2.32/1.63  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.32/1.63  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.32/1.63  
% 2.32/1.63  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.32/1.63  ----------------------
% 2.32/1.63  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 2.32/1.63  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.32/1.63  CNF conversion       : 0.01
% 2.32/1.63  Main loop            : 0.04
% 2.32/1.63  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 2.32/1.63  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.32/1.63  Demodulation         : 0.01
% 2.32/1.63  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.32/1.63  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.32/1.63  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.32/1.63  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.32/1.64  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.32/1.64  Total                : 0.51
% 2.32/1.64  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.32/1.64  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.32/1.64  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.32/1.64  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------