TSTP Solution File: ARI182_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI182_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.09s 1.24s
% Output   : Proof 3.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ARI182_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:28:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.68/0.65  ________       _____
% 0.68/0.65  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.68/0.65  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.68/0.65  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.68/0.65  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.68/0.65  (2023-06-19)
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.68/0.65  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.68/0.65                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.68/0.65  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.68/0.65  
% 0.68/0.65  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.66  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.10/1.06  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/1.06  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.10  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.10  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.10  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.10  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.10  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 2.47/1.14  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 3.09/1.23  Prover 3: proved (564ms)
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 6: stopped
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 0: stopped
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 5: proved (568ms)
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 2: proved (571ms)
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.09/1.24  
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.09/1.24  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 1: Found proof (size 8)
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 4: Found proof (size 7)
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 1: proved (577ms)
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 4: proved (578ms)
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.09/1.25  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.44/1.26  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.44/1.26  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.44/1.26  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.44/1.26  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 7: stopped
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 10: stopped
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.44/1.27  Prover 11: stopped
% 3.44/1.28  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.44/1.28  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.44/1.28  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.44/1.28  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.44/1.28  
% 3.44/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.44/1.28  
% 3.44/1.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.44/1.29  Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.44/1.29  ---------------------------------
% 3.44/1.29  
% 3.44/1.29    (co1)
% 3.63/1.32     ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v1, v0)) |  ~ (f(v0) = v1)) &  ?
% 3.63/1.32    [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: int] : ($lesseq(-1,
% 3.63/1.32        $sum($difference(v1, v3), v0)) & f($sum(v2, v1)) = v3 & f(v0) = v2)
% 3.63/1.32  
% 3.63/1.32  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.63/1.32  ---------------------------------
% 3.63/1.32  
% 3.63/1.32  Begin of proof
% 3.63/1.32  | 
% 3.63/1.32  | ALPHA: (co1) implies:
% 3.63/1.32  |   (1)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] : ( ~ ($lesseq(v1, v0)) |  ~ (f(v0) = v1))
% 3.63/1.32  |   (2)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: int] :
% 3.63/1.32  |        ($lesseq(-1, $sum($difference(v1, v3), v0)) & f($sum(v2, v1)) = v3 &
% 3.63/1.32  |          f(v0) = v2)
% 3.63/1.32  | 
% 3.63/1.33  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_4_0, all_4_1, all_4_2, all_4_3
% 3.63/1.33  |        gives:
% 3.63/1.33  |   (3)  $lesseq(-1, $sum($difference(all_4_2, all_4_0), all_4_3)) &
% 3.63/1.33  |        f($sum(all_4_1, all_4_2)) = all_4_0 & f(all_4_3) = all_4_1
% 3.63/1.33  | 
% 3.63/1.33  | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 3.63/1.33  |   (4)  $lesseq(-1, $sum($difference(all_4_2, all_4_0), all_4_3))
% 3.63/1.33  |   (5)  f(all_4_3) = all_4_1
% 3.63/1.33  |   (6)  f($sum(all_4_1, all_4_2)) = all_4_0
% 3.63/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_4_3, all_4_1, simplifying with (5)
% 3.78/1.33  |              gives:
% 3.78/1.33  |   (7)  $lesseq(1, $difference(all_4_1, all_4_3))
% 3.78/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with $sum(all_4_1, all_4_2), all_4_0,
% 3.78/1.33  |              simplifying with (6) gives:
% 3.78/1.33  |   (8)  $lesseq(1, $difference($difference(all_4_0, all_4_1), all_4_2))
% 3.78/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  | COMBINE_INEQS: (4), (8) imply:
% 3.78/1.33  |   (9)  $lesseq(all_4_1, all_4_3)
% 3.78/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  | COMBINE_INEQS: (7), (9) imply:
% 3.78/1.33  |   (10)  $false
% 3.78/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  | CLOSE: (10) is inconsistent.
% 3.78/1.33  | 
% 3.78/1.33  End of proof
% 3.78/1.33  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.78/1.33  
% 3.78/1.33  685ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------