%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : ARI181_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:16:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : ARI181_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 12:00:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  % Using integer theory
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_4537_n022.cluster.edu
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.42/1.02  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_4537_n022.cluster.edu 
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS derived 5 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 36 clauses.
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS allocated 6213 KBytes.
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS spent	0:00:00.04 on the problem.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.42/1.02  		0:00:00.03 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.42/1.02  		
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_4537_n022.cluster.edu
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  % Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.42/1.02  2[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(f(U),U)*.
% 0.42/1.02  3[0:Inp] || greatereq(f(f(f(6))),9)* -> .
% 0.42/1.02  16[0:ThA] ||  -> equal(U,V) less(V,U)* less(U,V)*.
% 0.42/1.02  35[0:ArS:2.0] ||  -> less(U,f(U))*.
% 0.42/1.02  36[0:ArS:3.0] || lesseq(9,f(f(f(6))))* -> .
% 0.42/1.02  37[0:TOC:36.0] ||  -> less(f(f(f(6))),9)*.
% 0.42/1.02  38[0:OCE:35.0,16.1] ||  -> equal(f(U),U) less(U,f(U))*.
% 0.42/1.02  44[0:ThR:38,37,35] ||  -> .
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_4537_n022.cluster.edu
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  Formulae used in the proof : fof_f_type fof_co1
% 0.42/1.02  
% 0.42/1.02  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------