TSTP Solution File: ARI181_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ARI181_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:33:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.96s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  19 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   31 (  14 atm;   0 fun;  14 num;   3 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   4 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp > f

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $int ).

tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skE_3',type,
    '#skE_3': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(f,type,
    f: $int > $int ).

tff(f_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [Ua: $int] : $greater(f(Ua),Ua)
     => $greatereq(f(f(f(6))),9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ $greatereq(f(f(f(6))),9),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    $less(f(f(f(6))),9),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    f(6) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    $less(f(f('#skE_1')),9),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_8]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    f('#skE_1') = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_17]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    $less(f(f('#skE_1')),9),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_8]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    $less(f('#skE_2'),9),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_29]) ).

tff(c_83,plain,
    f('#skE_2') = '#skE_3',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40]) ).

tff(c_5,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] : $greater(f(U_1a),U_1a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] : $less(U_1a,f(U_1a)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_5]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    $less('#skE_2','#skE_3'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_83,c_7]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    f('#skE_2') = '#skE_3',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    $less(f('#skE_2'),9),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_29]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    $less('#skE_3',9),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_73,c_72]) ).

tff(c_43,plain,
    f('#skE_1') = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_17]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    $less('#skE_1','#skE_2'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_43,c_7]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    f(6) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_25,plain,
    $less(6,'#skE_1'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14,c_7]) ).

tff(c_119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_112,c_80,c_64,c_25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ARI181_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:13:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.96/1.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.77  
% 2.96/1.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.96/1.80  
% 2.96/1.80  Inference rules
% 2.96/1.80  ----------------------
% 2.96/1.80  #Ref     : 0
% 2.96/1.80  #Sup     : 15
% 2.96/1.80  #Fact    : 0
% 2.96/1.80  #Define  : 3
% 2.96/1.80  #Split   : 1
% 2.96/1.80  #Chain   : 0
% 2.96/1.80  #Close   : 1
% 2.96/1.80  
% 2.96/1.80  Ordering : LPO
% 2.96/1.80  
% 2.96/1.80  Simplification rules
% 2.96/1.80  ----------------------
% 2.96/1.80  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.96/1.80  #Demod        : 3
% 2.96/1.80  #Tautology    : 6
% 2.96/1.80  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.96/1.80  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.96/1.80  
% 2.96/1.80  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.96/1.80  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.96/1.80  
% 2.96/1.80  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.96/1.80  ----------------------
% 2.96/1.80  Preprocessing        : 0.45
% 2.96/1.80  Parsing              : 0.26
% 2.96/1.80  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.96/1.80  Main loop            : 0.24
% 2.96/1.80  Inferencing          : 0.04
% 2.96/1.80  Reduction            : 0.05
% 2.96/1.80  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 2.96/1.80  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 2.96/1.80  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.96/1.80  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.96/1.80  MUC search           : 0.01
% 2.96/1.80  Cooper               : 0.04
% 2.96/1.80  Total                : 0.74
% 2.96/1.80  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.96/1.80  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.96/1.80  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.96/1.80  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------