TSTP Solution File: ARI177_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI177_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.55s 1.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09 % Problem : ARI177_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:15:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.13/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.55/1.02 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.55/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ iProver source info
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.55/1.02 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.55/1.02 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Parsing...
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Proving...
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 clauses 22
% 2.55/1.02 conjectures 1
% 2.55/1.02 EPR 7
% 2.55/1.02 Horn 19
% 2.55/1.02 unary 17
% 2.55/1.02 binary 2
% 2.55/1.02 lits 30
% 2.55/1.02 lits eq 16
% 2.55/1.02 fd_pure 0
% 2.55/1.02 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.55/1.02 fd_cond 0
% 2.55/1.02 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 2.55/1.02 AC symbols 2
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------
% 2.55/1.02 Current options:
% 2.55/1.02 ------
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 ------ Proving...
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 2.55/1.02 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(4,X0),$product(6,X1)) != 21),
% 2.55/1.02 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.55/1.02 ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(4,X0),$product(6,X1)) != 21),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f3,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.55/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f4,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.55/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.55/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f15,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.55/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f21,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(4,X0),$product(6,X1)) = 21),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f22,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(4,X0),$product(6,X1)) = 21 => 21 = $sum($product(4,sK0),$product(6,sK1))),
% 2.55/1.02 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f23,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 21 = $sum($product(4,sK0),$product(6,sK1))),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f21,f22])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 tff(f24,plain,(
% 2.55/1.02 21 = $sum($product(4,sK0),$product(6,sK1))),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 2.55/1.02 ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 2.55/1.02 ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 2.55/1.02 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 2.55/1.02 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 2.55/1.02 ($sum_int($product_int(4,sK0),$product_int(6,sK1)) = 21),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
% 2.55/1.02 ($sum_int($product_int(sK0,4),$product_int(sK1,6)) = 21),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_54,c_55,c_65,c_66])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_1026,plain,
% 2.55/1.02 ($sum_int($product_int(sK0,4),$sum_int($product_int(sK1,6),X0_3)) = $sum_int(21,X0_3)),
% 2.55/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_65])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 cnf(c_4878,plain,($false),inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1026])).
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.55/1.02
% 2.55/1.02
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------