TSTP Solution File: ARI122_1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : ARI122_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:06:20 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.84s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : ARI122_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri May  3 01:43:17 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.84/1.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------  iProver source info
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.84/1.20  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.84/1.20  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Parsing...
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  clauses                                 26
% 2.84/1.20  conjectures                             2
% 2.84/1.20  EPR                                     10
% 2.84/1.20  Horn                                    23
% 2.84/1.20  unary                                   21
% 2.84/1.20  binary                                  2
% 2.84/1.20  lits                                    34
% 2.84/1.20  lits eq                                 20
% 2.84/1.20  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.84/1.20  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.84/1.20  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.84/1.20  fd_pseudo_cond                          2
% 2.84/1.20  AC symbols                              2
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ 
% 2.84/1.20  Current options:
% 2.84/1.20  ------ 
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 2.84/1.20    ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (($product(2,X2) = X3 & $product(3,6) = X2 & $product(X0,6) = X1 & $product(2,3) = X0) => X1 = X3)),
% 2.84/1.20    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associative_product)).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.84/1.20    ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (($product(2,X2) = X3 & $product(3,6) = X2 & $product(X0,6) = X1 & $product(2,3) = X0) => X1 = X3)),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f3,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f4,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f15,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f18,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($product(X0,X1),$product(X0,X2))) )),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(theory_axiom_153,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f21,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (X1 != X3 & ($product(2,X2) = X3 & $product(3,6) = X2 & $product(X0,6) = X1 & $product(2,3) = X0))),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f22,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (X1 != X3 & $product(2,X2) = X3 & $product(3,6) = X2 & $product(X0,6) = X1 & $product(2,3) = X0)),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(flattening,[],[f21])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f23,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (X1 != X3 & $product(2,X2) = X3 & $product(3,6) = X2 & $product(X0,6) = X1 & $product(2,3) = X0) => (sK1 != sK3 & sK3 = $product(2,sK2) & $product(3,6) = sK2 & sK1 = $product(sK0,6) & $product(2,3) = sK0)),
% 2.84/1.20    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f24,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    sK1 != sK3 & sK3 = $product(2,sK2) & $product(3,6) = sK2 & sK1 = $product(sK0,6) & $product(2,3) = sK0),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f22,f23])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f25,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    $product(2,3) = sK0),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f26,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    sK1 = $product(sK0,6)),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f27,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    $product(3,6) = sK2),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f28,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    sK3 = $product(2,sK2)),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  tff(f29,plain,(
% 2.84/1.20    sK1 != sK3),
% 2.84/1.20    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_51,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),$product_int(X0_3,X2_3)) = $product_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_54,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_55,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_65,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_66,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      (sK1 != sK3),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(2,sK2) = sK3),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(3,6) = sK2),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK0,6) = sK1),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(2,3) = sK0),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK2,2) = sK3),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_54,c_55,c_65,c_66])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_208,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      (sK0 = 6),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_71])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_210,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK0,sK0) = sK1),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_208])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_211,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      (sK2 = 18),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_69])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_700,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3)) = $product_int(X1_3,$product_int(X0_3,X2_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_55])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_780,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK2,$product_int(X0_3,2)) = $product_int(X0_3,sK3)),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_700])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1150,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int(sK3,$product_int(sK2,X0_3)) = $product_int(sK2,$sum_int(2,X0_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_51])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1151,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int(sK1,$product_int(sK0,X0_3)) = $product_int(sK0,$sum_int(sK0,X0_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_51])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1155,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($product_int(X0_3,sK3),$product_int(sK2,X1_3)) = $product_int(sK2,$sum_int($product_int(X0_3,2),X1_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_780,c_51])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1936,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK0,$sum_int(sK0,sK0)) = $sum_int(sK1,sK1)),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_1151])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1968,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($product_int(sK0,X0_3),$sum_int(sK1,sK1)) = $product_int(sK0,$sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(sK0,sK0)))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1936,c_51])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1974,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int(sK1,$sum_int(sK1,$product_int(sK0,X0_3))) = $product_int(sK0,$sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(sK0,sK0)))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(theory_normalisation,
% 2.84/1.20                [status(thm)],
% 2.84/1.20                [c_1968,c_65,c_66,c_54,c_55])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_1975,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int(sK1,$product_int(sK0,$sum_int(sK0,X0_3))) = $product_int(sK0,$sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(sK0,sK0)))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1974,c_1151])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_2938,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK2,$sum_int($product_int(X0_3,2),$product_int(X1_3,2))) = $sum_int($product_int(X0_3,sK3),$product_int(X1_3,sK3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_780,c_1155])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_4203,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($sum_int($product_int(X0_3,sK3),$product_int(X1_3,sK3)),$product_int(sK2,X2_3)) = $product_int(sK2,$sum_int($sum_int($product_int(X0_3,2),$product_int(X1_3,2)),X2_3))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2938,c_51])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_4213,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($product_int(sK2,$sum_int(2,$sum_int($product_int(X0_3,2),$product_int(X1_3,2)))) = $sum_int(sK3,$sum_int($product_int(X0_3,sK3),$product_int(X1_3,sK3)))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2938,c_1150])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_4228,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($sum_int($product_int(X0_3,sK3),$sum_int($product_int(X1_3,sK3),$product_int(sK2,X2_3))) = $product_int(sK2,$sum_int($product_int(X0_3,2),$sum_int($product_int(X1_3,2),X2_3)))),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(theory_normalisation,
% 2.84/1.20                [status(thm)],
% 2.84/1.20                [c_4203,c_65,c_66,c_54,c_55])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  cnf(c_4383,plain,
% 2.84/1.20      ($false),
% 2.84/1.20      inference(smt_impl_just,
% 2.84/1.20                [status(thm)],
% 2.84/1.20                [c_4228,c_4213,c_1975,c_211,c_208,c_67])).
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.20  
% 2.84/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------