TSTP Solution File: ARI119_1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : ARI119_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.59s 1.08s
% Output : Proof 2.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ARI119_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:13:47 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 1.91/1.00 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.17/1.05 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 5: proved (448ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 2: proved (452ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 6: proved (448ms)
% 2.59/1.08
% 2.59/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/1.08
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 1: proved (455ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 0: proved (452ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 3: proved (452ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 4: proved (453ms)
% 2.59/1.08 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 2.59/1.09 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 2.59/1.10 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.59/1.10 Prover 7: stopped
% 2.59/1.10
% 2.59/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/1.10
% 2.59/1.10 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.59/1.10 Assumptions after simplification:
% 2.59/1.10 ---------------------------------
% 2.59/1.10
% 2.59/1.10 (product_4_4_16)
% 2.59/1.11 $false
% 2.59/1.11
% 2.59/1.11 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 2.59/1.11 ---------------------------------
% 2.59/1.11
% 2.59/1.11 Begin of proof
% 2.59/1.11 |
% 2.59/1.11 | CLOSE: (product_4_4_16) is inconsistent.
% 2.59/1.11 |
% 2.59/1.11 End of proof
% 2.59/1.11 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.59/1.11
% 2.59/1.11 506ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------