TSTP Solution File: ARI093_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ARI093_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:33:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.90s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   10 (   0 atm;   3 fun;   3 num;   4 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   0 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (;   3   !;   1   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:

tff(f_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [Xa: $int] : ( $difference(Xa,0) = Xa ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diff_zero_identity) ).

tff(f_86,plain,
    ! [Xa: $int] : ( $difference(Xa,0) != Xa ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(f_89,plain,
    ! [Xa: $int] :
      ( ! [Xa: $int] : ( $difference(Xa,0) != Xa )
    <=> $false ),
    inference(theorem,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],]) ).

tff(f_90,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equivalence,[status(thm)],[f_86,f_89]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ARI093_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:00:28 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.90/1.41  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/1.41  
% 1.90/1.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.90/1.45  
% 1.90/1.45  Inference rules
% 1.90/1.45  ----------------------
% 1.90/1.45  #Ref     : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Sup     : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Fact    : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Define  : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Split   : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Chain   : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Close   : 0
% 1.90/1.45  
% 1.90/1.45  Ordering : LPO
% 1.90/1.45  
% 1.90/1.45  Simplification rules
% 1.90/1.45  ----------------------
% 1.90/1.45  #Subsume      : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Demod        : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Tautology    : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 1.90/1.45  #BackRed      : 0
% 1.90/1.45  
% 1.90/1.45  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 1.90/1.45  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 1.90/1.45  
% 1.90/1.45  Timing (in seconds)
% 1.90/1.45  ----------------------
% 1.90/1.45  Preprocessing        : 0.37
% 1.90/1.45  Parsing              : 0.21
% 1.90/1.45  CNF conversion       : 0.01
% 1.90/1.45  Main loop            : 0.03
% 1.90/1.45  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Reduction            : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Demodulation         : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  BG Simplification    : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 1.90/1.45  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  MUC search           : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Cooper               : 0.02
% 1.90/1.45  Total                : 0.45
% 1.90/1.45  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 1.90/1.45  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------