TSTP Solution File: ARI077_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : ARI077_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:33:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.96s 1.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 16 ( 0 atm; 6 fun; 6 num; 4 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 0 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 (; 3 !; 1 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(f_30,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [Xa: $int] : ( $sum(Xa,$uminus(5)) = 0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_what_n5_0) ).
tff(f_88,plain,
! [Xa: $int] : ( $sum(Xa,$uminus(5)) != 0 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).
tff(f_91,plain,
! [Xa: $int] :
( ! [Xa: $int] : ( $sum(Xa,$uminus(5)) != 0 )
<=> $false ),
inference(theorem,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],]) ).
tff(f_92,plain,
$false,
inference(equivalence,[status(thm)],[f_88,f_91]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
$false,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_92]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ARI077_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 4 00:10:18 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.96/1.38 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.96/1.38
% 1.96/1.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.18/1.41
% 2.18/1.41 Inference rules
% 2.18/1.41 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.41 #Ref : 0
% 2.18/1.41 #Sup : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Fact : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Define : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Split : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Chain : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Close : 0
% 2.18/1.42
% 2.18/1.42 Ordering : LPO
% 2.18/1.42
% 2.18/1.42 Simplification rules
% 2.18/1.42 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.42 #Subsume : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Demod : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Tautology : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.18/1.42 #BackRed : 0
% 2.18/1.42
% 2.18/1.42 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.18/1.42 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.18/1.42
% 2.18/1.42 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.18/1.42 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.42 Preprocessing : 0.36
% 2.18/1.42 Parsing : 0.21
% 2.18/1.42 CNF conversion : 0.01
% 2.18/1.42 Main loop : 0.02
% 2.18/1.42 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Reduction : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Demodulation : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 BG Simplification : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.18/1.42 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Cooper : 0.02
% 2.18/1.42 Total : 0.43
% 2.18/1.42 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.18/1.42 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------