TSTP Solution File: ARI065_1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : ARI065_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:39:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.95s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ARI065_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:25:36 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.95/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.95/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.95/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.95/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  ------ Parsing...
% 0.95/1.16  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.95/1.16    ! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(2,X0) = 5 => 3 = X0)),
% 0.95/1.16    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum2_only_3_5)).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.95/1.16    ~! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(2,X0) = 5 => 3 = X0)),
% 0.95/1.16    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.95/1.16    introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.95/1.16    introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    ? [X0 : $int] : (3 != X0 & $sum(2,X0) = 5)),
% 0.95/1.16    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    ? [X0 : $int] : (3 != X0 & $sum(2,X0) = 5) => (3 != sK0 & 5 = $sum(2,sK0))),
% 0.95/1.16    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f17,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    3 != sK0 & 5 = $sum(2,sK0)),
% 0.95/1.16    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f15,f16])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f18,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    5 = $sum(2,sK0)),
% 0.95/1.16    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  tff(f19,plain,(
% 0.95/1.16    3 != sK0),
% 0.95/1.16    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_59,plain,
% 0.95/1.16      ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_60,plain,
% 0.95/1.16      ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 0.95/1.16      (sK0 != 3),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
% 0.95/1.16      ($sum_int(2,sK0) = 5),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
% 0.95/1.16      ($sum_int(sK0,2) = 5),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_59,c_60])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_160,plain,
% 0.95/1.16      (sK0 = 3),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_76])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  cnf(c_161,plain,
% 0.95/1.16      ($false),
% 0.95/1.16      inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_61])).
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.16  
% 0.95/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------