TSTP Solution File: ANA045-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : ANA045-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.78s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 3 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__left1_1,axiom,
( c_0 = c_times(c_0,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__left1_1) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44,axiom,
( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( c_0 = c_times(c_0,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__left1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_times(c_0,X1,t_b) = c_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_lessequals(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_0,t_b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,t_b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.32 % Problem : ANA045-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.33 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.32/0.53 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.32/0.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.32/0.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.32/0.53 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.32/0.53 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.32/0.53 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.32/0.53 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.32/0.53 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:39:51 EDT 2023
% 0.32/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.74/0.94 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.74/0.94 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b380eKI5I6/E---3.1_28118.p
% 0.78/1.18 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.78/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.78/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # new_bool_1 with pid 28235 completed with status 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.78/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.78/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.78/1.18 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.78/1.18 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 28239 completed with status 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.78/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.78/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.78/1.18 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.78/1.18 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.78/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.78/1.18 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.78/1.18 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.78/1.18
% 0.78/1.18 # Proof found!
% 0.78/1.18 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.78/1.18 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.78/1.18 # Parsed axioms : 2784
% 0.78/1.18 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1668
% 0.78/1.18 # Initial clauses : 1116
% 0.78/1.18 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1116
% 0.78/1.18 # Processed clauses : 1776
% 0.78/1.18 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.78/1.18 # ...subsumed : 201
% 0.78/1.18 # ...remaining for further processing : 1569
% 0.78/1.18 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.78/1.18 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.78/1.18 # Generated clauses : 575
% 0.78/1.18 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 447
% 0.78/1.18 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.78/1.18 # Paramodulations : 575
% 0.78/1.18 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # NegExts : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Total rewrite steps : 205
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.78/1.18 # Current number of processed clauses : 502
% 0.78/1.18 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 126
% 0.78/1.18 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.78/1.18 # Non-unit-clauses : 353
% 0.78/1.18 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 850
% 0.78/1.18 # ...number of literals in the above : 2485
% 0.78/1.18 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Current number of archived clauses : 1067
% 0.78/1.18 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 482970
% 0.78/1.18 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 220082
% 0.78/1.18 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 168
% 0.78/1.18 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 385
% 0.78/1.18 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # BW rewrite match attempts : 177
% 0.78/1.18 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.78/1.18 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.78/1.18 # Termbank termtop insertions : 53354
% 0.78/1.18
% 0.78/1.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.78/1.18 # User time : 0.153 s
% 0.78/1.18 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.78/1.18 # Total time : 0.162 s
% 0.78/1.18 # Maximum resident set size: 5024 pages
% 0.78/1.18
% 0.78/1.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.78/1.18 # User time : 0.205 s
% 0.78/1.18 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.78/1.18 # Total time : 0.216 s
% 0.78/1.18 # Maximum resident set size: 3508 pages
% 0.78/1.18 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.78/1.18 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------