TSTP Solution File: ANA044-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : ANA044-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.24s 300.10s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 4 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_times(v_l(v_x,v_xa),v_h(v_k(v_x,v_xa)),t_b) != c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(v_l(v_x,v_xa),v_h(v_k(v_x,v_xa)),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1) = X2
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0) ).
cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(X3,X2,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_l(X1,X2),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(X1),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_times(v_l(v_x,v_xa),v_h(v_k(v_x,v_xa)),t_b) != c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(v_l(v_x,v_xa),v_h(v_k(v_x,v_xa)),t_b),t_b),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1) = X2
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1) ),
cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(v_l(v_x,v_xa),v_h(v_k(v_x,v_xa)),t_b),t_b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(X3,X2,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X3,X1) ),
cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_l(X1,X2),t_b),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(X1),t_b),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(t_b)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09 % Problem : ANA044-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:43:21 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g99t2KBFTL/E---3.1_1879.p
% 0.24/300.10 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1993 completed with status 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.24/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/300.10 # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/300.10 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1997 completed with status 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.24/300.10 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/300.10 # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/300.10 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/300.10 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/300.10 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/300.10
% 0.24/300.10 # Proof found!
% 0.24/300.10 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/300.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/300.10 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.24/300.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.24/300.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.24/300.10 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.24/300.10 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.24/300.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.24/300.10 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.24/300.10 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.24/300.10 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.24/300.10 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.24/300.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.24/300.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/300.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.24/300.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/300.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.24/300.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.24/300.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.24/300.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.24/300.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/300.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 282
% 0.24/300.10
% 0.24/300.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/300.10 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/300.10 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/300.10 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/300.10 # Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
% 0.24/300.10
% 0.24/300.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/300.10 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/300.10 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/300.10 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/300.10 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.24/300.10 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------