TSTP Solution File: ANA042-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : ANA042-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OvgZtg91Sl/E---3.1_2069.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OvgZtg91Sl/E---3.1_2069.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : ANA042-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 15:27:46 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.65  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.65  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OvgZtg91Sl/E---3.1_2069.p
% 0.48/0.88  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.48/0.88  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.88  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2157 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.48/0.88  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.88  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.48/0.88  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.88  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2166 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.48/0.88  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.88  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.48/0.88  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.88  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.88  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 0.48/0.88  
% 0.48/0.88  # Proof found!
% 0.48/0.88  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.88  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.88  # Parsed axioms                        : 2787
% 0.48/0.88  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Initial clauses                      : 2787
% 0.48/0.88  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 0.48/0.88  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2778
% 0.48/0.88  # Processed clauses                    : 1413
% 0.48/0.88  # ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.48/0.88  # ...subsumed                          : 29
% 0.48/0.88  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1374
% 0.48/0.88  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.48/0.88  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.48/0.88  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.48/0.88  # Generated clauses                    : 2335
% 0.48/0.88  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1339
% 0.48/0.88  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Paramodulations                      : 2333
% 0.48/0.88  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.48/0.88  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1061
% 0.48/0.88  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.48/0.88  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1364
% 0.48/0.88  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 273
% 0.48/0.88  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.48/0.88  #    Negative unit clauses             : 26
% 0.48/0.88  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1064
% 0.48/0.88  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2704
% 0.48/0.88  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6212
% 0.48/0.88  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 0.48/0.88  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 524641
% 0.48/0.88  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 332074
% 0.48/0.88  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 0.48/0.88  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3554
% 0.48/0.88  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 65
% 0.48/0.88  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.48/0.88  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.48/0.88  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 67423
% 0.48/0.88  
% 0.48/0.88  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.88  # User time                : 0.154 s
% 0.48/0.88  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.48/0.88  # Total time               : 0.164 s
% 0.48/0.88  # Maximum resident set size: 6408 pages
% 0.48/0.88  
% 0.48/0.88  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.88  # User time                : 0.649 s
% 0.48/0.88  # System time              : 0.050 s
% 0.48/0.88  # Total time               : 0.698 s
% 0.48/0.88  # Maximum resident set size: 3512 pages
% 0.48/0.88  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------