TSTP Solution File: ANA037-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ANA037-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:27:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.27s 1.49s
% Output   : Refutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ANA037-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 04:26:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Fri Jul  8 04:26:37 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28290.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35  in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.27/1.49  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.27/1.49  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.27/1.49  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 1.27/1.49  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 1.27/1.49  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 1.27/1.49  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 1.27/1.49  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 90
% 1.27/1.49  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 1.27/1.49     distinct predicate count: 5
% 1.27/1.49     distinct function count: 5
% 1.27/1.49     distinct constant count: 5
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.27/1.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.27/1.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.07 sec ----> 114 [binary,113.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.27/1.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.27/1.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  1 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_a(v_xa),t_b),c_times(c_Orderings_Omax(v_c,v_ca,t_b),v_f(v_xa),t_b),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  2 [] {+} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_lessequals(B,c_Orderings_Omax(B,C,A),A).
% 1.27/1.49  3 [] {+} -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)| -c_lessequals(B,C,A)| -c_lessequals(D,B,A)|c_lessequals(D,C,A).
% 1.27/1.49  4 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(A)| -c_lessequals(B,C,A)| -c_lessequals(c_0,D,A)|c_lessequals(c_times(B,D,A),c_times(C,D,A),A).
% 1.27/1.49  5 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_Orderings_Olinorder(A).
% 1.27/1.49  6 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(A).
% 1.27/1.49  7 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_Orderings_Oorder(A).
% 1.27/1.49  8 [] {-} c_lessequals(c_0,v_f(v_xa),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  9 [] {-} c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_a(v_xa),t_b),c_times(v_c,v_f(v_xa),t_b),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  10 [] {-} class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  11 [hyper,10,7] {-} class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  12 [hyper,10,6] {-} class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  13 [hyper,10,5] {-} class_Orderings_Olinorder(t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  15 [hyper,13,2] {-} c_lessequals(A,c_Orderings_Omax(A,B,t_b),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  20 [hyper,15,4,12,8] {-} c_lessequals(c_times(A,v_f(v_xa),t_b),c_times(c_Orderings_Omax(A,B,t_b),v_f(v_xa),t_b),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  113 [hyper,20,3,11,9] {-} c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_a(v_xa),t_b),c_times(c_Orderings_Omax(v_c,A,t_b),v_f(v_xa),t_b),t_b).
% 1.27/1.49  114 [binary,113.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.27/1.49  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  ============ end of search ============
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.27/1.49  
% 1.27/1.49  Process 28290 finished Fri Jul  8 04:26:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------