TSTP Solution File: ANA031-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ANA031-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:27:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.63s 0.84s
% Output   : Refutation 0.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : ANA031-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 04:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.38  Fri Jul  8 04:11:50 2022
% 0.15/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24886.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.38  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.15/0.38  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.15/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.15/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.15/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 9
% 0.15/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.15/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.15/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.15/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 91
% 0.15/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.15/0.41     distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.15/0.41     distinct function count: 6
% 0.15/0.41     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.63/0.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.63/0.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.43 sec ----> 54 [binary,53.1,37.1] {+} $F.
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  Length of proof is 12.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.63/0.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.63/0.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.63/0.84  
% 0.63/0.84  1 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(v_x(A)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(A)),t_b),t_b),c_times(A,c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(A)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(A)),t_b),t_b),t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.84  2 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(A)|c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(B,A),A).
% 0.63/0.84  3 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(A)|c_times(c_times(B,C,A),D,A)=c_times(B,c_times(C,D,A),A).
% 0.63/0.84  4 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(A)|c_times(B,C,A)=c_times(C,B,A).
% 0.63/0.84  5 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(A)| -c_lessequals(B,C,A)| -c_lessequals(c_0,D,A)|c_lessequals(c_times(D,B,A),c_times(D,C,A),A).
% 0.63/0.84  6 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(A).
% 0.63/0.84  7 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(A).
% 0.63/0.84  8 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(A).
% 0.63/0.84  9 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(A).
% 0.63/0.85  10 [] {-} c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(A),t_b),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(A),t_b),t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  11 [] {-} class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  13 [para_into,10.1.2,4.2.1] {-} c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(A),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(A),t_b),v_c,t_b),t_b)| -class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  14 [hyper,11,9] {-} class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  15 [hyper,11,8] {+} class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  16 [hyper,11,7] {+} class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  17 [hyper,11,6] {+} class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  18 [hyper,14,2] {-} c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(A,t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  25,24 [hyper,16,3] {+} c_times(c_times(A,B,t_b),C,t_b)=c_times(A,c_times(B,C,t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  28 [hyper,17,13] {-} c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(A),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(A),t_b),v_c,t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  29 [hyper,17,4] {+} c_times(A,B,t_b)=c_times(B,A,t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  30 [hyper,28,5,15,18] {-} c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(A,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(B),t_b),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(A,t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(B),t_b),v_c,t_b),t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  37 [para_from,29.1.1,1.1.2,demod,25] {+} -c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(v_x(A)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(A)),t_b),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(A)),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(A)),t_b),A,t_b),t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  53 [para_into,30.1.1,29.1.1] {-} c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(A),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(B,t_b),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(B,t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(A),t_b),v_c,t_b),t_b),t_b).
% 0.63/0.85  54 [binary,53.1,37.1] {+} $F.
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.63/0.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  ============ end of search ============
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  true clauses given           6      (31.6%)
% 0.63/0.85  false clauses given         13
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.63/0.85    15  0         3
% 0.63/0.85    20  0         2
% 0.63/0.85    23  2         0
% 0.63/0.85    26  4         0
% 0.63/0.85    29  0         4
% 0.63/0.85    33  1         0
% 0.63/0.85    44  0         1
% 0.63/0.85  tot:  7         10      (58.8% true)
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.63/0.85  
% 0.63/0.85  Process 24886 finished Fri Jul  8 04:11:51 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------