TSTP Solution File: ANA028-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : ANA028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:54:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ANA028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 03:31:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.37 #
% 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 13 Number of unprocessed: 13
% 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.40 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.40 # 13 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.40 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.40 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.14/0.40 # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.40 # 10 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.40 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (c_lessequals(v_g(X1),v_k(X1),t_b))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~c_lessequals(c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_k(v_x),t_b),c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X1)|~class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)|~class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1)|~class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_minus(X1,X1,X2)=c_0|~class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (c_plus(c_0,X1,X2)=X1|~class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_lessequals(X1,c_minus(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X3,X4),X2,X4)|~class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_lessequals(c_minus(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3)|~c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X4,X2,X3),X3)|~class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_plus(X1,c_minus(X2,X3,X4),X4)=c_minus(c_plus(X1,X2,X4),X3,X4)|~class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_minus(c_plus(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3)=c_minus(X1,c_minus(X4,X2,X3),X3)|~class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3)=c_minus(c_plus(X1,X4,X3),X2,X3)|~class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 5 steps
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_106, plain, (c_lessequals(c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_k(v_x),t_b),c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_107, plain, (~c_lessequals(c_plus(c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_k(v_x),t_b),v_g(v_x),t_b),v_f(v_x),t_b)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_107, ...])).
% 0.14/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.40 # Returning from population with 5 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.40 # We now have 5 tableaux to operate on
% 0.14/0.40 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof search is over...
% 0.14/0.40 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------