TSTP Solution File: ANA023-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : ANA023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.82s 1.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 2 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X4,X3,X1)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__8_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_minus(X2,X4,X1),X3,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_plus(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__8_1) ).
cnf(clsrel_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add_10,axiom,
( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',clsrel_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add_10) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_4,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_4) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__10_0,axiom,
( X2 = c_plus(c_minus(X2,X3,X1),X3,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__10_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),v_f(v_x),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_54,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_54) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X4,X3,X1)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,X1) ),
cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(c_0,X1,t_b)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),X1,t_b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_minus(X2,X4,X1),X3,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_plus(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__8_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1) ),
clsrel_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_4 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(c_0,X1,t_b)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),c_plus(X1,v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( X2 = c_plus(c_minus(X2,X3,X1),X3,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X1) ),
cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__10_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(t_b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(X1,v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),X1,t_b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),v_f(v_x),t_b),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_54 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.28 % Problem : ANA023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.29 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.29/0.48 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.29/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.29/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.29/0.48 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.29/0.48 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.29/0.48 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.29/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.29/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:03:15 EDT 2023
% 0.29/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.79 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.41/0.79 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bOL4srYFQU/E---3.1_17751.p
% 8.82/1.97 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 8.82/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.82/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 17832 completed with status 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.82/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.82/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.82/1.97 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 8.82/1.97 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 17840 completed with status 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 8.82/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.82/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.82/1.97 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 8.82/1.97 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 8.82/1.97
% 8.82/1.97 # Proof found!
% 8.82/1.97 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.82/1.97 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.82/1.97 # Parsed axioms : 2809
% 8.82/1.97 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Initial clauses : 2809
% 8.82/1.97 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 9
% 8.82/1.97 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2800
% 8.82/1.97 # Processed clauses : 6395
% 8.82/1.97 # ...of these trivial : 104
% 8.82/1.97 # ...subsumed : 2993
% 8.82/1.97 # ...remaining for further processing : 3298
% 8.82/1.97 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 297
% 8.82/1.97 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Backward-subsumed : 32
% 8.82/1.97 # Backward-rewritten : 85
% 8.82/1.97 # Generated clauses : 35904
% 8.82/1.97 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29741
% 8.82/1.97 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 36
% 8.82/1.97 # Paramodulations : 35555
% 8.82/1.97 # Factorizations : 3
% 8.82/1.97 # NegExts : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Equation resolutions : 346
% 8.82/1.97 # Total rewrite steps : 18944
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional check models : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.82/1.97 # Current number of processed clauses : 3181
% 8.82/1.97 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 644
% 8.82/1.97 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 16
% 8.82/1.97 # Negative unit clauses : 137
% 8.82/1.97 # Non-unit-clauses : 2384
% 8.82/1.97 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26026
% 8.82/1.97 # ...number of literals in the above : 95529
% 8.82/1.97 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Current number of archived clauses : 125
% 8.82/1.97 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3047084
% 8.82/1.97 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1592614
% 8.82/1.97 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1678
% 8.82/1.97 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 100664
% 8.82/1.97 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2
% 8.82/1.97 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1087
% 8.82/1.97 # BW rewrite match successes : 61
% 8.82/1.97 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.82/1.97 # Termbank termtop insertions : 605201
% 8.82/1.97
% 8.82/1.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.82/1.97 # User time : 1.048 s
% 8.82/1.97 # System time : 0.037 s
% 8.82/1.97 # Total time : 1.085 s
% 8.82/1.97 # Maximum resident set size: 6444 pages
% 8.82/1.97
% 8.82/1.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.82/1.97 # User time : 5.039 s
% 8.82/1.97 # System time : 0.140 s
% 8.82/1.97 # Total time : 5.179 s
% 8.82/1.97 # Maximum resident set size: 3528 pages
% 8.82/1.97 % E---3.1 exiting
% 8.82/1.97 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------