TSTP Solution File: ANA016-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : ANA016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.98s 2.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 11 unt; 4 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 17 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34) ).
cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Oright__inverse_0,axiom,
( X2 = c_0
| c_times(X2,c_HOL_Oinverse(X2,X1),X1) = c_1
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Oright__inverse_0) ).
cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__right1_2,axiom,
( X2 = c_times(c_1,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__right1_2) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_24,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_24) ).
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0,axiom,
( c_times(c_times(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_times(X2,c_times(X3,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
v_g(v_x) != c_times(v_c,c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(v_c,t_a),v_g(v_x),t_a),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
v_c != c_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(t_a),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( X2 = c_0
| c_times(X2,c_HOL_Oinverse(X2,X1),X1) = c_1
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
cls_Ring__and__Field_Oright__inverse_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( X2 = c_times(c_1,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__right1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X1) ),
clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_24 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( c_times(c_times(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_times(X2,c_times(X3,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X1) ),
cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oinverse(X1,t_a),t_a) = c_1
| X1 = c_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_times(c_1,X1,t_a) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
v_g(v_x) != c_times(v_c,c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(v_c,t_a),v_g(v_x),t_a),t_a),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( c_times(X1,c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(X1,t_a),X2,t_a),t_a) = X2
| X1 = c_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
v_c != c_0,
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.32 % Problem : ANA016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.32/0.33 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.32/0.54 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.32/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.32/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.32/0.54 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.32/0.54 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.32/0.54 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.32/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.32/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:04:20 EDT 2023
% 0.32/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.77/0.93 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.77/0.93 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.boZJvk49a9/E---3.1_4623.p
% 11.98/2.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 11.98/2.48 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.98/2.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4781 completed with status 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 11.98/2.48 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.98/2.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.98/2.48 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 11.98/2.48 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with pid 4792 completed with status 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN
% 11.98/2.48 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.98/2.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.98/2.48 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 11.98/2.48 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 11.98/2.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 11.98/2.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.98/2.48
% 11.98/2.48 # Proof found!
% 11.98/2.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.98/2.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.98/2.48 # Parsed axioms : 2789
% 11.98/2.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Initial clauses : 2789
% 11.98/2.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 9
% 11.98/2.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2780
% 11.98/2.48 # Processed clauses : 14258
% 11.98/2.48 # ...of these trivial : 718
% 11.98/2.48 # ...subsumed : 6075
% 11.98/2.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 7465
% 11.98/2.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 620
% 11.98/2.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Backward-subsumed : 86
% 11.98/2.48 # Backward-rewritten : 248
% 11.98/2.48 # Generated clauses : 55830
% 11.98/2.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44352
% 11.98/2.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 11.98/2.48 # Paramodulations : 54997
% 11.98/2.48 # Factorizations : 174
% 11.98/2.48 # NegExts : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Equation resolutions : 659
% 11.98/2.48 # Total rewrite steps : 30775
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 11.98/2.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 4470
% 11.98/2.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1435
% 11.98/2.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 24
% 11.98/2.48 # Negative unit clauses : 607
% 11.98/2.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 2404
% 11.98/2.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31747
% 11.98/2.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 87131
% 11.98/2.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 3003
% 11.98/2.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4777635
% 11.98/2.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2524019
% 11.98/2.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2019
% 11.98/2.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 235156
% 11.98/2.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 24
% 11.98/2.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3495
% 11.98/2.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 266
% 11.98/2.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 11.98/2.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 685299
% 11.98/2.48
% 11.98/2.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.98/2.48 # User time : 1.430 s
% 11.98/2.48 # System time : 0.043 s
% 11.98/2.48 # Total time : 1.474 s
% 11.98/2.48 # Maximum resident set size: 6412 pages
% 11.98/2.48
% 11.98/2.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.98/2.48 # User time : 6.992 s
% 11.98/2.48 # System time : 0.200 s
% 11.98/2.48 # Total time : 7.191 s
% 11.98/2.48 # Maximum resident set size: 3512 pages
% 11.98/2.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 11.98/2.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------