TSTP Solution File: ANA014-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ANA014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:26:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.79s 1.95s
% Output   : Refutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  16 unt;   1 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (  10 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    v_c != c_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X)),t_a),c_times(X,c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_a),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X)),t_a),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X)
    | c_times(c_1,Y,X) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X)
    | c_times(c_times(Y,Z,X),U,X) = c_times(Y,c_times(Z,U,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0) ).

cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X)
    | c_lessequals(Y,Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(Y,Z,X),X) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(Y,X),c_HOL_Oabs(Z,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Ofield__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X)
    | Y = c_0
    | c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(Y,X),Y,X) = c_1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Ofield__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_12,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_12) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_21,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_21) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X)
    | class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X)
    | class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_58,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(X)
    | class_Orderings_Oorder(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_58) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_0,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_34,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field_58,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_21,14]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_12,14]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(v_c,t_a),v_c,t_a) = c_1,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Ofield__class_Oaxioms__1_0,14,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X,Y,t_a),t_a) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_a),c_HOL_Oabs(Y,t_a),t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0,15]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X)),t_a),c_times(X,c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(v_c,v_f(v_x(X)),t_a),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,21,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    c_lessequals(X,X,t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,16]) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    c_times(c_times(X,Y,t_a),Z,t_a) = c_times(X,c_times(Y,Z,t_a),t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult__class_Omult__assoc_0,17]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    c_times(c_1,X,t_a) = X,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult__class_Oaxioms__1_0,18]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_a))),t_a),c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(c_times(X,v_c,t_a),v_f(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_a))),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[22,21,theory(equality)]),24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1595,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,19,theory(equality)]),23,25,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ANA014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 06:03:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  "."
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T06:03:08
% 0.20/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-07-08T06:03:08
% 1.79/1.95  
% 1.79/1.95  
% 1.79/1.95  #||
% 1.79/1.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.79/1.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.79/1.95  ||#
% 1.79/1.95  
% 1.79/1.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.79/1.95  ;      3516 formulas have been input or derived (from 80 formulas).
% 1.79/1.95  ;      1595 (45%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.79/1.95  ;           65 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.79/1.95  ;         1530 (96%) are still being kept.
% 1.79/1.95  ; 
% 1.79/1.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.003   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (13 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.241  16%   Process new row              (3,467 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.002   0%   Resolution                   (158 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.059   4%   Paramodulation               (79 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (25 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.025   2%   Condensing                   (1,505 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.253  17%   Forward subsumption          (1,505 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.036   2%   Backward subsumption         (817 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.081   5%   Clause clause subsumption    (22,045 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.288  19%   Forward simplification       (3,448 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.052   4%   Backward simplification      (1,595 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.407  27%   Ordering                     (65,466 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.79/1.95  ;     0.035   2%   Other
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1.484        Total
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1.486        Real time
% 1.79/1.95  ; 
% 1.79/1.95  ; Term-hash-array has 3,554 terms in all.
% 1.79/1.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 788 entries (788 at peak, 817 added, 29 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,592 nodes (3,592 at peak, 3,797 added, 205 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ;  Retrieved 22,743 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,505 calls.
% 1.79/1.95  ;  Retrieved 5,116 possibly backward subsumed rows in 817 calls.
% 1.79/1.95  ; Path-index has 3,432 entries (3,432 at peak, 3,622 added, 190 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ; Path-index has 4,784 nodes (4,784 at peak, 5,007 added, 223 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ; Trie-index has 3,432 entries (3,432 at peak, 3,622 added, 190 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ; Trie-index has 31,688 nodes (31,688 at peak, 33,310 added, 1,622 deleted).
% 1.79/1.95  ; Retrieved 29,419 generalization terms in 29,731 calls.
% 1.79/1.95  ; Retrieved 3,863 instance terms in 2,175 calls.
% 1.79/1.95  ; Retrieved 11,174 unifiable terms in 613 calls.
% 1.79/1.95  ; 
% 1.79/1.95  ; The agenda of rows to process has 31 entries:
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value 35              2 with value 42               1 with value 50
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value 36              1 with value 44               5 with value 51
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value 37              3 with value 45               1 with value 52
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value 38              2 with value 47               5 with value 53
% 1.79/1.95  ;     2 with value 40              1 with value 48               2 with value 54
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value 41              1 with value 49
% 1.79/1.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1454 entries:
% 1.79/1.95  ;     1 with value (4 29)         48 with value (4 39)          13 with value (4 47)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    11 with value (4 31)         47 with value (4 40)          22 with value (4 48)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    12 with value (4 32)        103 with value (4 41)          14 with value (4 49)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    18 with value (4 33)         98 with value (4 42)          17 with value (4 50)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    21 with value (4 34)        223 with value (4 43)           5 with value (4 51)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    26 with value (4 35)        333 with value (4 44)          16 with value (4 52)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    49 with value (4 36)        188 with value (4 45)          12 with value (4 53)
% 1.79/1.95  ;    97 with value (4 37)         18 with value (4 46)           2 with value (4 55)
% 1.79/1.96  ;    60 with value (4 38)
% 1.79/1.96  Evaluation took:
% 1.79/1.96    1.486 seconds of real time
% 1.79/1.96    1.33566 seconds of user run time
% 1.79/1.96    0.151205 seconds of system run time
% 1.79/1.96    [Run times include 0.106 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.79/1.96    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.79/1.96    0 page faults and
% 1.79/1.96    125,748,584 bytes consed.
% 1.79/1.96  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.79/1.96  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T06:03:10
% 1.79/1.96  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.79/1.96  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------